Deputy head of the Federal Air Transport Agency Vedernikov became a victim of developers' lobbyism? Mineralnye Vody International Airport named after Lermontov.


Aviation is a concept associated with flights in the atmosphere of devices heavier than air and the entire system of organizations and government agencies that use aircraft. Aviation includes: Balloons, airships, planes, helicopters. In Russia, there are types of aviation: Civil aviation, subdivided into commercial aviation and general aviation; State aviation is subdivided into Military, Ministry of Emergency Situations, FSB and Experimental aviation.

Neradko Alexander Vasilievich

First Deputy Minister of Transport of Russia - Head federal agency air transport. Previously, he held the position of head of Rostransnadzor and the air navigation service of Russia. Acting State Councilor of the Russian Federation of the first class. Master of sports in high jump.

Mineralnye Vody International Airport
named after Lermontov

Mineralnye Vody International Airport named after Mikhail Yuryevich Lermontov is a federal airport, the largest in Stavropol Territory and the North Caucasian Federal District, is one of the largest in the South of Russia. Located 4 kilometers west of the city of Mineralnye Vody. The airport has one artificial runway class "A" with a length of 3900 and a width of 60 meters. Runway allows you to accept all calculation types aircraft without restrictions on weight and intensity. It is certified for landing foreign-made aircraft with low-mounted engines. CEO airport is Chuev Roman Viktorovich.

Khabarovsk-Novy International Airport
named after Admiral Gennady Nevelsky

Khabarovsk-Novy International Airport, named after Admiral Gennady Nevelsky, is the largest air hub in the Far Eastern Federal District. Every year the airport serves more than 2 million passengers and about 30 thousand tons of cargo. The complex belongs to class "A" and has two parallel runways measuring 3500x45 m and 4000x60 m. The airfield has a year-round opportunity to receive and release almost any type of aircraft and is designed to park 55 aircraft. Khabarovsk - Novy Airport is one of the 6 airports in Russia that have a certificate for the ninth - highest category for fire safety for flights and airport infrastructure, as well as for search and rescue support. The powers of the sole executive body of Khabarovsk Airport were transferred to the management company - Management Company KOMAKS LLC.

Zhukovsky International Airport

Zhukovsky International Airport of Federal Importance is one of the 4 main airports in Moscow. It is located at the Ramenskoye test airfield, in the zone of the Moscow Aviation Hub. The declared capacity of the first stage of the air harbor is 4 million passengers annually. Capable of receiving any type of aircraft without takeoff weight limitation. The main runway 12/30 of the airfield, 5.4 km long, is the longest not only in Russia, but also in Europe. The dimensions of the working part of the runway are 4600 × 70 m. It operates as a single aviation center for experimental, state and civil aviation. The owner is JSC RAMPORT AERO.

Yasny International Airport - Iturup

Yasny International Airport in Sakhalin region is located on Iturup Island near the villages of Kurilsk, Reidovo and Kitovoe, with which it is connected by an asphalt highway. The dimensions of the runway are 2300x42 m, allowing to receive aircraft such as An-2, An-24, An-26, An-32, An-74, L-410, Bombardier Dash 8, Sukhoi Superjet 100, as well as helicopters of all types and occasionally - An-12. In the future, it should help the development of such sectors of the Kuril economy as tourism, trade, and logistics. In addition, the construction of Yasnoye led to the launch of a mechanism for providing families with housing for dispatchers. The airport has one terminal and serves flights of two airlines - Aurora and Yakutia.

Aviation enterprise "Gazprom avia"

Gazprom Avia is a subsidiary of PJSC Gazprom. It occupies a stable position in the Russian business aviation market, being one of the industry leaders. The airline is among the top ten domestic airlines; ranks second in the Russian helicopter market. The airline is the general air carrier of PJSC Gazprom and its subsidiaries. The company operates cargo and passenger flights throughout the country, as well as to Europe, Australia, Asia, America and Africa. He has experience of working in extreme conditions, hard-to-reach terrain and polar latitudes. Gazprom Avia operates the largest business class aircraft fleet in Russia, as well as its own airports.

Gagarin International Airport in Saratov

Yuri Gagarin International Airport - located in the village of Saburovka Saratov region, 20 km from the capital of the region. total area passenger terminal is 23 thousand m2. The capacity is designed for 1 million passengers per year, 570 passengers per hour. The modern terminal building provides the quality of service for passengers of level "C" according to the IATA classification. The airport has an artificial runway 3 km long and 45 meters wide. The length of the runway and its bearing capacity will make it possible to receive most types of modern medium- and long-haul aircraft. The territory provides for 21 parking spaces for aircraft, as well as the use of three air bridges with the possibility of installing two more.

12:07 - REGNUM Dismissal of the Prime Minister of the Russian Federation Dmitry Medvedev Deputy Head of the Federal Air Transport Agency (Rosaviatsiya) Alexandra Vedernikova happened amid talk of changing building regulations near airports. Disputes around areas adjacent to air harbors have been underway for many years. They resumed in 2019, when, according to media reports, the Ministry of Transport of the Russian Federation began holding meetings on the topic of reducing airport territories. It was reported that these meetings were attended not only by representatives of federal departments, but also by capital developers.

Ivan Shilov © IA REGNUM

Until 2017, the aerodrome area was considered to be a circle with a radius of 30 kilometers from the middle of the runway. For the past two years, legislation has divided the territories into seven sub-zones, in the largest of which, the seventh, housing can be built. However, there are restrictions on the level of noise from aircraft. At the same time, developers need to negotiate and fulfill additional requirements. For example, windows of increased thickness are used in houses.

In April 2019, Kommersant noted, citing sources, that the authorities of the regions in which they are located major airports, are interested in reducing the aerodrome territories occupying large areas. At the same time, the Ministry of Transport proposed legislative amendments, which provided for the transition to standards for the equivalent noise level.

As a result, the airports, which are supervised by the Federal Air Transport Agency, which is under the jurisdiction of the Ministry of Transport of the Russian Federation, calculated the territories according to the noise level, but they still turned out to be large and did not suit the developers.

In October, Prime Minister Dmitry Medvedev instructed Rospotrebnadzor to change the methodology for assessing the level of noise generated by airports, Vedomosti reports. According to the current sanitary rules, the noise level is estimated according to the maximum and equivalent (average) noise. Medvedev, the publication noted with reference to the minutes of the meeting, instructed to measure the level of exposure only by equivalent noise.

By lawyer Natalia Tarasova, an initiative to allow construction near airports could be lobbied by developers as it opens up great prospects for building housing near airports. She believes that the new apartments will be relatively inexpensive.

“The rules for determining the noise level are changing, not the level itself. In other words, flight noise will feel exactly the same as it always has, but it will be lower according to the documents.”- Tarasova told the correspondent IA REGNUM.

According to sources IA REGNUM, the territories around the airports of the Moscow region turned out to be in the conflict zone. In particular, the commissioning of the third runway at Sheremetyevo increased the airport area. Including already built houses got into the sanitary zone, funds are provided for their resettlement.

However, the most tasty were the territories of New Moscow near the Vnukovo airport. The Moscow authorities are planning to build a metro line to the airport, which will significantly increase the cost of land and demand for them.

In the activities of airports, developers and the executive authorities fulfilling their will could meet inappropriate resistance, and Vedernikov's resignation will be a clear signal for an early change in the real situation with the possibility of building near air hubs.

Andrei Belyakov. Photo viperson.ru

At the end of April, the Prosecutor General's Office and the FSB conducted a joint inspection of the Federal Air Transport Agency (Rosaviatsiya). Numerous violations were found in its work, concerning both the actions of the agency as a whole and the decisions of individual leaders, said a source close to the supervisory agency. The information was confirmed by a source familiar with the audit.

Design changes without justification and maintenance without certificates

The audit was carried out before the SSJ100 crash at Sheremetyevo and revealed that more than 400 aircraft had been introduced with changes to the standard design without conducting the necessary studies and performing certification work, the source said.

According to the results of the audit, the Federal Air Transport Agency also did not take action against nine airlines that are in an "improper financial and economic condition," he added. According to the Prosecutor General's Office, this may affect the regularity of flights.

More than 80 line stations carry out Maintenance aircraft registered in Bermuda in the absence of a corresponding certificate issued by the Federal Air Transport Agency, a source familiar with the verification process also said. “The approval of such stations has been terminated due to the position of the Ministry of Transport,” the source explained.

The remarks of the Prosecutor General's Office also state that during the certification of maintenance organizations located outside of Russia, "illegal delegation of authority" was allowed. The Aircraft Maintenance Entity Certificate of Compliance was issued by Vector Aerospace Helicopter Services Inc. after an on-site inspection conducted without the participation of an employee of the Federal Air Transport Agency, but with his signature in the control check cards.

Representatives of Vector Aerospace Helicopter Services Inc. did not answer calls from RBC.

Diploma without exams and conflict of interest

The prosecutor's office also has personal claims against the leadership of the agency. In particular, the audit showed that the deputy head of the Federal Air Transport Agency in 2009 received a diploma from the St. Petersburg State University of Civil Aviation without passing tests and exams in five disciplines. And Valery Kudinov, the head of the airworthiness maintenance department for aircraft of the Federal Air Transport Agency, found a conflict of interest. “It was established that the head of the department did not take measures to resolve the conflict of interest. He issued airworthiness certificates based on the conclusions of Airways Technics LLC, which involved his son Kudinov S.V. to inspect aircraft, ”a source familiar with the inspection materials told RBC. Kudinov also violated federal aviation regulations in the area of ​​the airworthiness confirmation procedure. “These violations did not allow issuing legal permits for a number of aircraft,” the source said.

In addition, the Prosecutor General's Office established that the head of the aircraft airworthiness department issued an airworthiness certificate for a Boeing 767-300 aircraft (tail number RA73030) that does not comply with the requirements of aviation regulations. “The aircraft is still operated by the Azur Air airline,” the department’s materials say.

Anastasia Matyushina, director of the information policy and communications department of Azur Air, told RBC that she did not know anything about this.

A source familiar with the audit spoke about another fact related to Kudinov's work: the audit found that, based on his decision to certify Vector Aerospace Helicopter Services Inc. an unauthorized legal entity was involved (LLC "CS Liner"). “In fact, the official shifted the performance of state functions to commercial organization, with which the operator was forced to conclude an agreement for 1.1 million rubles,” the source said.

A source familiar with the course of the audit told RBC that specialists from the agency and the Ministry of Transport, in charge of which it is located, are currently working to eliminate the identified violations.

“According to all the comments, the Federal Air Transport Agency has prepared comprehensive materials that will be considered jointly with representatives of the Prosecutor General’s Office in the manner prescribed by law,” the press service of the Federal Air Transport Agency told RBC. RBC's source in the agency said that no conflicts of interest were identified during the internal audit.

According to Andrei Belkov, a former physical education teacher who rose to the position of the first deputy director of the Federal Security Service Yevgeny Murov in the state security and Federal Security Service and was non-publicly dismissed in 2016 - the decree on his removal was not made publicly available, and the presidential press secretary Dmitry Peskov personnel reshuffle "rotation".

  • Specialty HAC RF07.00.02
  • Number of pages 166

Section I. Historical traditions of ensuring the security of the first persons of the Soviet state and the peculiarities of the work of government security bodies in the conditions of perestroika (1985-1991) .18

Section II. Changes in the socio-political system of Russia and new tasks of the bodies of protection of state leaders in the 1990s.

Section III. Expansion of the range of security tasks in the context of the growth of the terrorist threat in Russia in the 1990s.

Recommended list of dissertations in the specialty "National History", 07.00.02 VAK code

  • The historical experience of the activities of the bodies of protection of the first persons of the Soviet State in 1945-1953. 2004, candidate of historical sciences Torgashov, Evgeny Petrovich

  • State Security Bodies in Russian Press Coverage (1991 - 1999) 2008, candidate of historical sciences Demidenko, Sergey Vyacheslavovich

  • Formation and activities of the territorial bodies of government communications and information of the Russian Federation: 1991 - early 2000s. (on the materials of the Kursk and Oryol regions) 2012, Candidate of Historical Sciences Harnaga, Vladislav Vyacheslavovich

  • The activities of the state security units of the USSR in 1939-1945. 2012, candidate of historical sciences Zhilyaev, Valentin Ivanovich

  • Formation of the system for ensuring the national security of the Russian Federation in the face of the growing threat of international terrorism: 1992-2004. 2007, Doctor of Historical Sciences Shargorodskaya, Sofia Borisovna

Introduction to the thesis (part of the abstract) on the topic "Activities of the Russian government security bodies in 1985 - 1999"

Relevance of the research topic. The historical experience of protecting the personal security of leading political figures in Russia in the selected chronological framework of 1985-1999. is not only of obvious practical interest for modern special services, but also of exclusively scientific and historical interest in connection with the analysis of the dynamics of threats to political stability in the country. In the first place in modern Russia is the terrorist threat, which in recent years has acquired a global scale. Security officers pay no less attention to counterintelligence work, which is also an important element in ensuring the safety of state leaders. Finally, in recent years, the range of domestic threats to the security of Russia's political elite has significantly expanded, and an effective fight against it is impossible without relying on historical experience.

The author also connects the relevance of the study with the need to involve in scientific circulation a number of new documents that were previously inaccessible to researchers, mainly from the current archive of the Federal Security Service (FSO). The emergence of new archival materials can significantly expand the understanding of researchers about the "epoch of transition" in the life of the country, as well as about some features of the interaction of protected persons, mainly Presidents M.S. Gorbachev and B.N. Yeltsin with their employees and subordinates.

The degree of scientific development of the problem of ensuring the protection of the state leaders of Russia cannot be considered satisfactory, which indicates the need for its additional in-depth systematic study and generalization. Despite the presence of some printed materials on this subject, mainly journalistic, this area of ​​historical knowledge seems to be practically undeveloped.

From the mid 1980s. under the conditions of perestroika, despite partial changes in the field of state ideology, the problem of ensuring the personal security of members of the government, due to historical inertia, remained closed. However, already at that time, separate works appeared that indirectly touched on this topic.1 Serious gaps at this stage in the development of historiography were mainly due to the lack of a full-fledged source base for research. It is also impossible not to note the traditional psychological barrier that prevented the study of topics closed for many years.2

See: Always on duty. Tula, 1985; Gerasimov A.P. Organizational structures of internal affairs bodies. M., 1984; Nekrasov V.F. On guard of the interests of the Soviet state. The history of the construction of the troops of the Cheka-OGPU-NKVD-MVD. M., 1983; The fight continues. Irkutsk, 1982; Budarin M.E. Chekists. Omsk, 1987.

2 See: Soviet militia: History and modernity. 1917-1985. M., 1987; Viktorov B.L. Unmarked secret. Notes of the military prosecutor. M., 1990, etc.

A noticeable historiographical breakthrough, mainly quantitative, was observed during the first half of the 1990s, which was associated with the rapid processes of democratization and the associated mass denunciations of the work of the KGB and other power structures of the USSR.3 Among the publications of this time, the works of V. AT. Bakatin, one of the most prominent leaders of the Soviet special services.4 Despite the well-known ideological emancipation of historical science in the 1990s, the emergence of special memoirs and the expansion of the source base of research, the work of the government guards still remained a “blank spot” in post-Soviet historiography. An exception against this background was the publication of the memoirs of V.T. Medvedev - head of security L.I. Brezhnev and M.S. Gorbachev, in which, for the first time after many years of silence, the principles of ensuring the security of the first persons of the Soviet state were revealed, the features of the staffing of government guards and the tasks of its employees were shown.5

An integral part of historiography is the work of a general political plan, which affects the daily work of the protected Presidents (M.S. Gorbachev, B.N. Yeltsin)

3 See: Albats E.M. Time bomb (Political portrait of the KGB). M., 1992; The KGB reveals secrets. Collection. M., 1992.

4 See: Bakatin V.V. Getting rid of the KGB. M., 1992; Bakatin V.V. Road in the past tense. M., 1999.

5 Medvedev V.T. The man behind his back: (Memoirs of the head of the guard L.I. Brezhnev and M.S. Gorbachev). M., 1994. and leading political figures of Russia, the schedule of their meetings, foreign visits and official receptions 6 In the mid-1990s. interest in the topic led to the emergence of semi-publicistic works, a striking example of which are the books of B.C. Kraskova.7 At the same time, historiography is replenished with quite scientific works that affect the history of the KGB and individual special services.8 A more detailed study of this issue took place within the framework of all-Russian scientific conferences.9 Expanding the spectrum

6 See: Popov G.Kh. Selected works in VIII vol. M., 1996; Political parties of Russia: history and modernity. M., 2000; Efimov V.I. Power in Russia. M.: RAGS, 1996; Sogrin V. Political history of modern Russia, 1985-1994: From Gorbachev to Yeltsin. M.: Progress-Academy, 1994; Sulemov V.A. The mechanism of staffing the public service. M., 1997; Potapov S.E. Political process and economic reforms in Russia. M., 1997; Reforms in Russia V.T. Petrov (editor-in-chief) Russian Academy of Management. M., 1996; Modern political history of Russia (1985-1998). T.1. M., 1999.

See: Kraskova B.C. Secrets of the Kremlin guard. Minsk, 1998; She is. Kremlin children. Minsk, 1995; She is. The heirs of the Kremlin. Minsk, 1997; She is. Kremlin clans. Minsk, 1998; She is. Kremlin mistresses. Minsk, 1999; She is. Kremlin Gold. Minsk, 1998; She is. Gray cardinals of the Kremlin. Minsk, 1998, etc.

8 See: White Book of the Russian Special Services. M., 1996; Lubyanka: bodies of the Cheka-OGPU-NKGB-MGB-KGB. 1917-1991. Directory. Comp. A.I. Kokurin, N.V. Petrov. M., 2003; Mikhailov A.G. Portrait of a minister in the context of the Time of Troubles: Sergei Stepashin. M., 2001; Lubyanka: ensuring the economic security of the state: Historical chronicle events. Collection. M., 2002.

9 See: KGB: yesterday, today, tomorrow. III international conference. October 13, 1993 Reports and discussions. M., 1994. Issues under study and the objectivity of studies that appeared in the second half of the 1990s. due to the replenishment of the source base with memoirs and memoirs of the heads of special services, high-ranking officials and security officials.10

A special block of historiography is associated with the names of V. Grushko, M. Dokuchaev, P. Deryabin, O. Gordievsky, L. Shebarshin, who describe the work of employees of the government protection in the transitional period of the country's history.11 The publication of A. Korzhakov's memoirs had a tremendous resonance, since he wrote them about the current president.12 In turn, publications about A. Korzhakov himself are quite informative, who

10 See: Lebed A.I. Shame on the state. M., 1998; Lebed A.I. The performance was called putsch. The unknown about the known. General's memories airborne troops. Teraspol, 1993; Stepashin S.V. Theoretical and legal aspects of ensuring the security of the Russian Federation. Diss. . doc. legal Sciences. SPb., 1994; Primakov E.M. Years in big politics. M.: Sov. secret, 1999; Putin V. A friend among strangers // Economics and life. 2000. No. 16; Kostikov V.V. Romance with the President: Deputy. Press secretary. M.: Vagrius, 1997 and others.

11 See: Grushko V.F. The fate of the scout: a book of memories. M., 1997; Dokuchaev M.S. Moscow. Kremlin. Security. M., 1994; Deryabin P. Guards of the Kremlin. From the Okhrana to the 9th Directorate of the KGB. M., 2000; Gordievsky O.A. The next stop is the execution. M., 1999; Shebarshin L.V. From the life of the head of intelligence. M., 1997.

12 See: Korzhakov A.V. Boris Yeltsin: From dawn to dusk. M.: Interbuk, 1997. 480 p. led the security of B.N. Yeltsin during the most difficult period of his reign.13 It is impossible not to mention the works on the history and theory of Russian security, covering certain aspects of the organization of personal protection of the country's political elite.14

A certain contribution to the coverage of the stated topic was also made by foreign authors, who wrote, in particular, about the legal aspects of the activities of the KGB in the 1980s and 90s. and Russia.

characteristic feature In the final period of historiography, there was a growing interest in the published memoirs of the heads of special services, security officials, and direct participants in the political events of the turn of the 1980s–1990s. (especially the putsch of 1991) and the first half of the 1990s. The most notable surge of interest in the work of organs

13 Moiseenkov N.F. Notes of an assistant to a deputy of the State Duma. M., 1999; Serve Russia. M., 2001.

14 See: Zelenkov M.Yu. Legal foundations of the general theory of security of the Russian state in the 19th century. M., 2002; Russia and international security regimes. Collection of works of the participants of the project "Russian political culture and international law". M., 1998.

15 See: Waller J.M. secret empire. The KGB in Russia today. Boulder, 1994 and others.

16 See: Popov A.Yu. 15 meetings with KGB general Belchenko. M., 2002; Yeltsin B.N. President's Notes. M.: "Spark", 1994; Yeltsin B.N. Presidential Marathon: Reflections, memories, impressions. M.: ACT, 2000 and others. Protection appeared at the turn of the 1990s. - the new 20th century, which seems to have been connected with the increased threat to the political security of the country and the personal security of its leaders in recent years.17

In general, historiography is only developing, which determines the additional relevance and significance of the presented study.

The purpose of the dissertation research is to analyze the experience and specifics of the work of the security services of the state leaders of the USSR and the Russian Federation in 1985-1999 using new historical data. by solving the following tasks: to reveal the historical traditions of ensuring the security of the first persons of the Soviet state and to show the features of the work of government security agencies in the context of perestroika; identify the most important changes in the socio-political system of Russia and reveal the complex of new tasks of the bodies of protection of state leaders in the 1990s;

Determine the degree of growth of the terrorist threat in Russia in the 1990s. and show the expansion of the range of security tasks associated with this.

17 See: In the first person. Conversations with Vladimir Putin. M., 2000; Drozdov Yu.I. Yuri Andropov and Vladimir Putin. On the road to revival. M., 2001; Medvedev R.A. Putin time? M., 2001; Medvedev R.A. Vladimir Putin is the current president. M., 2002; Rahr A. Vladimir Putin. M., 2002, etc.

The source base of the study includes a variety of materials that allow the most comprehensive consideration of the process of ensuring the security of state leaders

USSR and the Russian Federation in the transitional era. Given the specifics of the topic under study and the almost complete absence of direct published sources, the author paid considerable attention to archival materials, as well as memoirs and

18 memoirs of government guards.

Working with archival sources is currently difficult due to the lack of a clear systematization of materials from the 1990s, which applies mainly to the funds of the current archive of the Federal Security Service. Along with the Current Archive of the FSO, the thesis used the funds of the State Archive of the Russian Federation (SARF) and the Russian State Archive of Contemporary History (RGANI), which contain information on the political history of the country in 1985-1999.

The most interesting source for analysis was periodicals: newspapers and magazines, periodical reference publications, as well as electronic media. The main attention was paid to the study of reports published in the central press about the movements of the President and members of the Government.

18 See: Medvedev V.T. The man behind his back: (Memoirs of the head of the guard L.I. Brezhnev and M.S. Gorbachev). M., 1994; Dokuchaev M.S. Moscow. Kremlin. Security. M., 1994; Korzhakov A.V. Boris Yeltsin: From dawn to dusk. M.: Interbuk, 1997.

RF, organizing high-level meetings, foreign visits, etc.

The chronological framework of the dissertation covers the period from 1985 to 1999. The choice of the initial chronological framework of the dissertation is connected with the activation in the country in the second half of the 1980s. destructive social and political processes, which greatly complicated the work of government security. The transition period had the most direct impact on the work of the security department in terms of a significant expansion of the range of tasks performed by its employees. A noticeable stabilization in the activities of the Federal Security Service manifested itself only towards the end of the 1990s, which determined the boundaries of the upper chronological framework of the study.

The following principles were chosen as the theoretical and methodological basis of the study: objectivity, historicism, consistency, full consideration of the socio-subjective in the subject of research and the maximum possible neutralization of the biased attitude of the scientist in interpreting and evaluating facts. In addition to methodological principles, special historical principles were applied in the study: actualization, comparative historical, problem-chronological, as well as general scientific ones: classifications, statistical, structural-systemic, which made it possible to consider in a complex the process of organizing the protection of the first persons of the USSR and the Russian Federation in a chronological framework 1985-1999

The novelty of the dissertation research lies in the fact that the author, for the first time in Russian historiography, within the framework of his Ph.D. thesis, explores the structural evolution and the most important principles of the work of the government guard of the Russian Federation in the context of a change in the political system of the country and the nationwide crisis of 1985-1999.

The paper gives a high assessment of the work of the Soviet special services that provided protection for the state leaders of the country, shows the effectiveness of the interaction between various departments for ensuring the security of government members, and the high level of training of their employees. The author refers to the shortcomings of the security organization of the political leaders of the USSR the dependence of the security service (9th Directorate of the KGB) on the unified system of the State Security Committee, its rigid relationship with the structures of the CPSU, the almost complete absence of its own independent information support and the inability to quickly transform depending on drastic changes in the political and operational environment. The study showed that the lack of real competition also had negative consequences. At the same time, in terms of its structure, functions, staffing and, most importantly, its place in the system of state institutions, the security service fully corresponded to the mechanisms of state-political power in the Soviet Union. In this regard, the author substantiates the conclusion about the regularity of a serious transformation of government protection following the collapse state system in the early 1990s.

For the first time in the dissertation, the circumstances of the structural restructuring of the protection of the first persons of the state, caused by the reorganization that began in August 1991, and in fact the complete destruction of the KGB, are studied in detail. Taking into account the new data, the author shows the destructive role of V.V. Bakatin, appointed by M.S. Gorbachev, in agreement with B.N. Yeltsin, to the post of chairman of the KGB in August 1991. In an effort to decentralize the management of government security and using his experience of the collapse of the unified system of the Ministry of Internal Affairs, Bakatin led, in fact, to the complete elimination of the personal security of the first persons of the state, which in the future had to be actually built anew by A. AT. Korzhakov.

The scientific novelty of the study lies in the identification of the close relationship of all structural transformations of the government guard in accordance with the changes in the political situation of the transitional period. In particular, the author substantiates the fact that the separation of the security service from the jurisdiction of the KGB and its transformation by M.S. Gorbachev to the Main Directorate of Security of the USSR, directly subordinate to the President, was caused by the fears of the leader of the country of a repetition of the events of August 1991. The author explains the transfer of Group “A” 7 of the KGB Directorate (“Alpha”) to the personal subordination of M.S. Gorbachev.

The author concludes that in the conditions of decentralization of power in the first half of the 1990s. and failed attempts by General of the Army V. Barannikov to consolidate the power structures of the country, the protection of the first persons of the state was extremely ineffective, which was only partially offset by the creation at the end of 1993 of the Security Service of the President of Russia, headed by General A. Korzhakov. The study showed that the new special body only by the mid-1990s. managed to establish effective physical protection for B.N. Yeltsin, carefully monitor the threats to the security of the President and carry out the necessary intelligence and operational activities.

The dissertation proves that in the second half of the 1990s. The main task of the government guard is to prevent the terrorist threat, the fight against which is becoming the central focus of the work of all Russian special services, including the Presidential Security Service. The author connects the success of the activities of government security in this area mainly with significant amounts of funding and the use of international experience in solving these problems. Among the negative aspects of ensuring the security of the first persons of the state, the author highlights the weak work of counterintelligence, which, in his opinion, was explained by the illusions of the end of " cold war» and transition to equal partnership with the countries of the West.

The practical significance of the study lies in the fact that the study gave results that can serve as a basis for strengthening the current government protection, creating effective protection for government officials from all sorts of threats and challenges of our time. In addition, the research materials can be used to develop lecture courses, special seminars, educational and methodological literature on history, political science and other disciplines of higher education.

Approbation of the study. The results of the work were reflected in the printed works of the applicant, and also found application in the course of his direct professional activities. The dissertation research was discussed and recommended for defense at a meeting of the Department of History of Mil State University.

The structure of the dissertation research. The dissertation consists of an introduction, three sections, a conclusion, a list of sources and references.

Dissertation conclusion on the topic "National history", Belyakov, Andrey Vyacheslavovich

CONCLUSION

In the dissertation, a comprehensive study of the work of government security in 1985-1999 was carried out, its structure and principles of organization were shown. The study showed that the security service had deep traditions, was professional and met the highest standards. The government guards received special training and were fluent in the means of protection entrusted to them. They were armed with the most first-class weapons and special equipment: machine guns, pistols, radio stations, devices for detecting weapons, air control, food, etc. They had reliable, well-protected, comfortable transport: airplanes, helicopters, cars, boats, special wagons.

The maximum efficiency of the work of the guards was achieved due to the well-thought-out division of the functions of its employees. The main actors in the security service of the Soviet leaders were the so-called "attached" - the heads of the personal guards of the leaders, responsible for their safety and the closest assistants - field guards, accompanying and ensuring the safety of protected persons in all their places of residence. The security leaders built the tactics of their actions in close cooperation with security officers on the routes of travel, operational and technical services and maintenance.

The government security service built its activities in close contact with the 4th Main Directorate under the USSR Ministry of Health, whose medical personnel - doctors and nurses assigned to high leaders, were obliged to assist security officers. From a professional point of view, the interaction of security personnel with the crews of aircraft and helicopters, crews of trains and railway workers who transported Soviet leaders around the country and often accompanied them during foreign visits was quite effective.

One of the most important features of the work of the Soviet government security service was that its employees had to pay a lot of attention to resolving various incidents that occurred with members of the family of a protected person (car accidents and quarrels in public places, unwanted acquaintances, persistent desire on the part of strangers through relatives to find approaches to protected ones, etc.). The analysis of such cases carried out in the work showed that the level of professional training of employees of the 9th Directorate of the KGB of the USSR and the broad powers provided for their activities made it possible to localize various conflicts in a short time and find the best ways out of difficult situations.

P.M. Gorbachev was, in fact, the first of the wives of Soviet leaders who actively participated with her husband in official ceremonies, trips around the country and abroad. She strove to be simple, to seem well-versed in the rules of etiquette, but sometimes she went beyond them. Often P.M. Gorbachev was shown in front of her husband or emphasized how she interfered in his conversation. At times, this was facilitated by the media, photo and television correspondents who sought to bring her to the fore, to show unusual sides in her behavior. Employees of the government security service have repeatedly prevented conflicts that were brewing in this area and smoothed out the existing contradictions.

The heads of the security service and its subdivisions were primarily responsible for protecting the political leaders of the USSR and creating normal working conditions for all high leaders of the country and foreign guests. The position they occupied in the security agencies and the tasks they performed made it possible to keep abreast of many domestic and international events, activities carried out by the country's leadership, to take a direct part in matters hidden from public opinion for a certain time, to be in sight of the protected persons and to know them better and better than anyone else. However, due to special selection and professional training, Soviet security officers never used this information for personal gain, and even after the resignation of the political leadership, they retained their personal loyalty to him.

The paper also shows that the economic and socio-political transformations carried out in the country, which began at the April plenum of the Central Committee of the CPSU (1985), led to the destabilization of public life, exacerbated the complex of social contradictions and thereby significantly complicated the tasks of government protection . The situation became so complicated that in 1990, even in Moscow, rationing was introduced to supply the population with food (with the exception of bread). Popular dissatisfaction with the policy of the party and government, in particular - dissatisfaction with the anti-alcohol campaign, aggravated ethnic conflicts, etc. demanded greater vigilance from government guards, especially when organizing meetings of government leaders with representatives of the working people.

Fundamental changes in the work of the security service began in August 1991, which was largely due to the intensive change of its personnel after the failed coup attempt. The acceleration of this process was also given by the fact that many security officers, forced to follow orders, were arrested and were under investigation. Many leaders of the 9th Directorate of the KGB and individual security units who were not involved in the coup attempt, seeing the current situation, filed a report themselves and retired from service. The head of the 9th department of the KGB of the USSR, General Yu.S. Plekhanov, his deputies, Generals V.V. Maksenkov, M.V. Titkov, head of the personal security department, General V.V. Aleinikov and many others.

From that time on, the general collapse of the KGB began, before that a very powerful organization that for many years reliably ensured the state security of the country and the reliable protection of its leaders. A special role in this process belonged to V.V. Bakatin, who previously headed the USSR Ministry of Internal Affairs. The section notes that it was Bakatin, who was striving for cooperation with Western partners, who handed over to his American colleagues, in particular, to the US Ambassador to Moscow R. Straus, information and documentation regarding the operational and technical means installed in the American embassy, ​​as well as a number of important information. related to the organization of the government security service.

As a result of a complex of large-scale reorganizations of law enforcement agencies, the government security service was significantly weakened in the early 1990s. the level of its work did not meet the safety requirements. In particular, in 1991, under the pretext of eliminating political investigation, the 3rd Directorate of the KGB of the USSR, which was engaged in the protection of the constitutional order and the fight against terrorism, was abolished. Created in the autumn of 1991, the Federal Security Agency of the Russian Federation (AFB), headed by B.

Yeltsin Major General V. Ivanenko at this stage could not provide the proper level of security.

Special attention the work is devoted to the work of the Security Service of the President of Russia, created in 1993, headed by General A.V. Korzhakov. The author notes that the effectiveness of the work of the new department was largely determined by the personal qualities of A.V. Korzhakov, who managed in the shortest possible time to select a qualified staff and establish in his department the discipline necessary in the difficult conditions of the autumn of 1993. The study showed that Korzhakov, who was the personal bodyguard of B.N. Yeltsin, enjoyed colossal powers far beyond his status. Based on archival materials and personal memoirs of the general, the author notes that during the October events, Korzhakov not only led the President's guards, but also personally gave orders, organized tankers and even led arrests.

The author concludes that A.V. Korzhakov in the Government Security Service and the continuous strengthening of his position. The study showed that, despite his resignation, until the publication of his infamous memoirs in 1997, Korzhakov was perceived by President Yeltsin and members of his family as a reliable person and devoted comrade-in-arms, capable of skillfully organizing the proper level of security for the first persons of the state.

The paper also notes that in the context of the growing economic crisis, the aggravation of interethnic conflicts and the inability of the central government to effectively combine the interests of local and federal development by the mid-1990s. the terrorist threat acquired a new meaning, which required the activation of the government security service. For a number of objective and subjective reasons, the place of greatest concentration of terrorist groups in the country during the 1990s. remained Chechnya. In the 1990s The “profession” of a militant turned out to be the most prestigious in the republic. The authorities were unable to turn the young generation of Chechens towards the tasks of restoring the economy, routine work in production or agriculture. The Chechens were at a stage in their historical development when increased conflict, aggressiveness towards the external environment was the dominant feature of their social behavior. Under these conditions, the craving for clashes, for the forceful overcoming of obstacles in solving everyday problems of ethnic self-assertion, has become irresistible. It is no coincidence that the field commanders of the armed formations of Chechnya have repeatedly declared their intention to carry out terrorist attacks against the first persons of the Russian Federation, and, in particular, against B.N. Yeltsin and V.V. Putin.

Since the effective work of the Government Security Service did not allow representatives of international terrorism to realize their threats against the state leaders of the Russian Federation, the main blow of the militants was aimed at the physical elimination of local leaders loyal to Russia in Chechnya, Dagestan, Kalmykia and other regions

South of the country. The scale of the threat of terrorism was evidenced by the assault on the building of the State Council of the Republic of Dagestan in Makhachkala, carried out on May 21, 1998 by the forces of two hundred militants. State Duma deputy Nadir Khachilayev and a group of radical Islamists-Wahhabis were named as the instigators of the pogrom. The weakness of the Russian state system was manifested in the fact that no lessons were learned from this threat to the country's security. Khachilaev remained a deputy of the State Duma, none of the militants was punished.

In the section, the author shows that in the 1990s. mass killings of judges, law enforcement officers, military personnel, major heads of enterprises and organizations, famous scientists, deputies of Legislative assemblies took on a mass character. In October 1995, an assassination attempt was made on the commander-in-chief of the grouping of Federal troops in Chechnya, A. Romanov. The facts of kidnappings were constantly increasing: in 1994 there were 500 of them; - already 766. 1997 surpassed the previous two years combined. The problem of preventing the taking of hostages, possible manifestations of environmental and nuclear blackmail and terrorism did not weaken. The new tasks put forward by the time to ensure the security of the first persons of the country required prompt response, highly professional training and hard work from the Government Security Service.

List of references for dissertation research candidate of historical sciences Belyakov, Andrey Vyacheslavovich, 2004

1. ARCHIVAL FOUNDATIONS.

2. State archive of the Russian Federation. GARF. F. 428. GARF. F. 4372. GARF. F. A-605.

3. Russian State Archive of Recent History RGANI. F. 4. RGANI. F. 5. RGANI. F. 89.

4. Current archive of the Federal Security Service Collection of documents

5. LEGISLATION AND REGULATIONS. Constitution (Basic Law) of the Russian Federation - Russia. M.: Izvestia, 1993. 127 p.

6. Gazette of the Supreme Soviet of the RSFSR. 1990-1993. Vedomosti SND RF and RF Armed Forces. 1990-1993. Gazette of the Congress of People's Deputies of the Russian Federation and the Supreme Council of the Russian Federation. 1990-1993.

7. Collection of acts of the President of the Russian Federation and the Government of the Russian Federation (SAPP). 1993-1999.

8. Collection of legislation of the Russian Federation (SZ RF). 1993-1999.

9. Collection of decrees of the Government of the RSFSR. 1990-1993.

10. Instructions on the procedure for licensing and exercising control over private detective and security activities by internal affairs bodies. Approved by order of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation No. 299 dated November 14, 1994.

11. Law on private detective and security activities in the Russian Federation. M., 1995.

12. Instructions for organizing the work of a district police inspector approved by order of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia No. 231 dated 14.08.92

13. Police legislation in Russia: Collection of regulations / Comp. V.V. Chernikov. M.: URAIT, 2000. -660 p.

14. New laws and regulations. M., 1998.

15. New laws and regulations. M.: Rossiyskaya Gazeta, 1997.-79s.

16. Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation “On the conclusion of agreements between the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation and the competent departments of foreign states” No. 653 of June 29, 1995 // Rossiyskaya Gazeta. 1995. July 18.

17. Law enforcement agencies: Collection of laws / Comp. I.I. Ovchinnikov. M.: Ivan LLP, 1994. 383 p.

18. Order of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia dated June 22, 1999 No. 456. “On measures to improve the activities of the public security police in combating offenses in the consumer market of goods and services.”

20. Collection of international treaties of the Russian Federation on the provision of legal assistance. M., 1996. p. 616.

21. Collection of international agreements of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia. M., 1996.

22. STATISTICAL AND REFERENCE LITERATURE. Contract killings in Russia / Comp. A. Plakhov. M.: Surf, 1998.-384 p.

23. The results of the operational and service activities of the internal affairs bodies and the service and combat activities of the internal troops of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation in 1996 (Report to the citizens of the Russian Federation). M., 1997.

24. Criminal regime. Chechnya, 1995: Facts, documents, evidence. M.: Code, 1995. - 95 p.

25. Moscow. Autumn-93: Chronicle of confrontation. M.: Respublika, 1995. 657 p.

26. Crime and offenses in the USSR: Statistical collection; 1989 / Ministry of Internal Affairs of the USSR, Ministry of Justice of the USSR, Prosecutor's Office of the USSR. M.: Yurid. lit., 1990. 111 p.

27. Russian Statistical Yearbook: Statistical Collection. M., 1994-2000.

28. Russia in numbers: Brief stat. collection. M.: Goskomstat, 1999.-416 p.

29. Collection of statistical materials, 1990. M.: Finance and statistics, 1991.-351 p.

30. The state of crime in Russia in January-December 1999, M., 2000.

31. Handbook of a policeman: Regulations, comments, recommendations / Ed. IN AND. Nikolaev. M.: INFRA, 1998.-248 p.

32. Strict supervision of the tax authorities. What is checked and how tax office and tax police. Legislative and normative documents, explanations, recommendations. M.: Rossiyskaya Gazeta, 1996.

33. Judicial statistics: crime and conviction. M., 2002.p.15.

34. Our standard of living in 1913-1993 Analytical handbook / Comp. V.M. Uralov. M.: B.I., 1995. 47 p.

35. LITERATURE "Military" famine.// Homeland. 1995, No. 11 Avtorkhanov A.G. The riddle of Stalin and the conspiracy of Beria M., 1995. Aleksandrov A.P. Years with Kurchatov. // Science and life. 1983, No. 2.

36. Alidin V.I. State Security and Time (19511986). M., 2001.

37. Alferova I.V. State policy towards deported peoples 1930 -1950. M., 1998.

38. Anashkin G., Babin N. The public and the strengthening of the socialist law and order//Communist. 1960. No. 10. Antonov Ovseenko A. Beria. M.: ACT. 1999. Antonov - Ovseenko A. Marshals of Stalin. M., 1998

39. Antonov Ovseenko A. Theater I.V. Stalin. M., 2000. Baibakov N.K. From Stalin to Yeltsin. M., 1998. Basov A.V., Gutenmakher G.I. Persian Corridor.// Military History Journal. 1994, No. 1

40. Beria (Gegichkori) S.L. My father is Lavrenty Beria. M.: Sovremennik, 1994.

41. Berlin (Potsdam) conference. M., 1984. Bobrenev V., Ryazantsev V. Varsanofevsky ghosts.// Motherland. 1995, No. 11.

42. The fight continues. Stories about the Kaluga Chekists. Tula, 1987.

43. Bugai N.F. Beria to Stalin: "According to your instructions." M., 1993.

44. Budarin M.E. Chekists. Omsk, 1987.

45. Bystrova I.V. Military-industrial complex of the USSR // Soviet society: emergence, development, historical finale. M., 1997.

46. ​​Vaksberg A. Undisclosed secrets. M., 1993 Valikhnovsky T. At the origins of the struggle against the reactionary underground in Poland. 1944 1948. Kyiv, 1984.

47. Vernadsky V.I. Favorites, v.1. Moscow: Publishing House of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR, 1954.

48. The troops are called internal. Brief historical outline. M., 1982.

49. Volkogonov D A. Triumph and tragedy. M., 1990, v.2. Wolfson F.I., Zontov N.S., Shushaniya G.R. Antropov P.Ya. Moscow: Nauka, 1985.

50. Always on duty. Tula, 1985.

51. Vympel: Special Forces Group of the KGB of the USSR: Facts, memories, testimonies, fates. M., 1997.

52. Gogol V.A., Malkov V.D. The leadership of the CPSU is the basis of the scientific organization of management in the internal affairs bodies. M., 1972.

53. Golovanov Ya.I. Korolev: Facts and myths. Moscow: Nauka, 1994.

54. Golovin I.N. Culmination.// Sputnik. 1990, No. 4.

55. Golovin I.N. Russian Research Center Kurchatov Institute. Unpublished manuscripts. M., 1992.

56. Golovin I.N., Smirnov Yu.N. It started in Zamoskvorechye. M.: Institute of Atomic Energy. Kurchatova, 1989.

57. Gordievsky O.A., Andrew K. KGB. Intelligence operations from Lenin to Gorbachev. M., 1999.

58. Gorelov M.M. Where is the threat from? // Military history magazine. 1989, No. 2

59. State Defense Committee.// Bulletin of the archive of the President of the Russian Federation. 1995, No. 2.

60. Gulag during the Great Patriotic War // Military History Journal. 1991, No. 1.

61. Danilov A.A. state activity of L.P. Beria in 1953. Materials of the scientific and practical conference: "The role of the individual in the history of the Fatherland." M., 1993. Issue 1.

62. Danilov A.A. Pyzhikov A.V. The Birth of a Superpower: The USSR in the Early Postwar Years. Moscow: Rosspan. 2001.

63. Danilov A.A. Stalin's Politburo in the post-war years. Article in the collection: Political parties. History pages. Moscow: Moscow University Press, 2000.

64. Danilov A.A., Leonov S.V. etc. History of Russia. In 2 volumes. M., 1995.

65. Djilas M. The face of totalitarianism. M., 1991.

66. Dzhunkovsky V.F. Memories. In 2 volumes. M., 1997.

67. Jewish Anti-Fascist Committee in the USSR 1941 1948. M., 1996.

68. Elfimov Yu.N. Marshal of Industry: A Biographical Sketch of A.R. Zavenyagin. Chelyab.: Yuzh.Uralsk. book. Publishing house, 1982.

69. Zhezhurin I.F. Construction and start-up of the first nuclear reactor in the Soviet Union. Moscow: Atomizdat, 1978.

70. Zhukov Yu.N. Secrets of the Kremlin. Stalin, Molotov, Beria, Malenkov. M.: Terra, 2000.

71. Zenkovich N. Leaders at gunpoint. Attacks and staging. Minsk, 1996.

72. Zubkova E.Yu. Post-war Soviet society: politics and everyday life 1945-1953 M., 2000.

73. Ivanova G.M. Deportation of the peoples of the USSR. M., 1994.

74. Ivashutin P.I. Reported accurately. // Military history magazine. 1990, No. 5.

75. History of the All-Union Communist Party (Bolsheviks). Short course. M., 1945.

76. History of diplomacy. M., 1975, v.4.

77. Kaptelov B. I. OUN in the service of fascism // Military History Journal. 1991, No. 5.

78. Kaftanov S.V. On alarm: the story of the authorized GKO Kaftanov // Chemistry and Life. 1985, No. 6.

79. KGB reveals secrets. SPb., 1992.

80. KGB: yesterday, today, tomorrow. International conferences and round tables. M., 1995, 1997.

81. Kisunko G.V. Confession of the general designer. M.: Sovremennik, 1996.

82. Kobba D.V. State activity of L.P. Beria (1939-1953). M., 2002.

83. Kovalev V.A. Two Stalinist people's commissars. M., 1995.

84. Korovin VV History of domestic security agencies. M., 1998.

85. Kostrychenko G. Case of doctors // Motherland. 1994, No. 7.

86. Kostyrchenko G.V. Captured by the red pharaoh. M., 1994.

87. Kostyrchenko G.V. Ideological wars of the second half of the 1940s: pseudo-patriots against pseudo-cosmopolitans // Soviet society: emergence, development, historical finale. T.2. M., 1997.

88. Purse P.A. History of Russian terrorism. M., 1995.

89. Kraskova B.C. Secrets of the Kremlin Guard. Minsk, 1998.

90. Krivitsky V.G. I Was Stalin's Agent: Notes of a Soviet Intelligence Officer. M., 1996.

91. Crimean Conference. Moscow: Politizdat. 1979.

92. Who led the NKVD 1934 1941. Directory. M.: Links. 1999.

93. Kurchatov I.V. Selected works in Zt. v.Z. Nuclear energy. M. Nauka, 1984.

94. Lebedev V. The investigation resorted to perverted methods.// Source. 1993, No. 4.

95. Levshin B.V. Soviet science during the Great Patriotic War. Moscow: Nauka, 1983.

96. Mironov N.R. Strengthening law and order in the state of the whole people is the program task of the party. M., 1964.

97. Mlechin L.M. KGB leaders. Decayed destinies. M., 1999.

98. Moscow Chekists in the defense of the capital 1941-1942.// Military History Journal. 1991, No. 1.

99. Mulukaev R.S. Development of the control system of the Internal Affairs Directorate of the USSR. M., 1979.

100. Our name is Dzerzhintsy. Ed. Political Directorate of the Internal Troops of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the USSR. M., 1984.

101. Narmin O.N. Repressions against the command staff of the Red Army. 1937-1941. M., 1993.

102. National military formations: yesterday, today, tomorrow.//Military history magazine. 1990, No. 5.

103. Khrushchev's unknown initiative // ​​Domestic archives. 1993, No. 2.

104. Nekrasov V.F. On guard of the interests of the Soviet state. The history of the construction of the troops of the Cheka-OGGGU-NKVD-MVD. M., 1983.

105. Novikov VN. Patronage of Beria. Beria: the end of a career. M., 1991.

106. Openkin L.A. At a historical crossroads.//Questions of the history of the CPSU. 1990, No. 1

107. Orlov A. The secret history of Stalin's crimes. M., 1991.

108. Osipov S.N. Autumn 1939. On the issue of Polish prisoners of war.// Military History Journal. 1989, No. 5.

109. Essays on the history of Russian foreign intelligence.: In bt.t. - v.4. 1941 1945 years. Moscow: International relations, 1999.

110. Panasyuk I.S. The first Soviet nuclear reactor. Soviet atomic science and technology. Moscow: Atomizdat. 1967.

111. Papchinsky A.A., Tumshis M.A. A shield shattered by a sword. NKVD vs VChK. M., 2001.

112. Pervukhin M.G. The first years of the atomic project.// Chemistry and life. 1985, No. 5

113. Pervukhin M.G. At the origins of the uranium epic.// Technique for youth. 1975, No. 6, No. 7.

114. Pestov S. Bomb. Secrets and passions of the atomic underworld. M., 1995.

115. Pikhoya R.G. Soviet Union: The history of power, 1945-1991. Novosibirsk: Siberian Chronograph, 2000.

116. Plotnikov N.D. Deathbringers. // Military history magazine. 1991, No. 3.

117. Complete and final victory of socialism in the USSR. Digest of articles. M., 1963.

118. Popov B.S., Oppokov V.G. Berievshchina.// Military history magazine. 1990, No. 11, No. 12, 1991, No. 1.

119. Stalin's last illness. From the reports of the Ministry of State Security of the USSR on the mood in the army in the spring of 1953 // Unknown Russia. XX century. Book. 2. M., 1992.

120. Rodikov V. Lavrenty Beria and perestroika. Kuban. 1990.12.

121. Sidorenko V.P. Troops of the NKVD in the Caucasus 1941 1945. St. Petersburg, 2000.

122. Sominsky M.S. Abram Fedorovich Ioffe. Leningrad: Nauka, 1964.

123. Starkov B. One Hundred Days of the “Lubyansk Marshal” // Source. 1993, No. 4.

124. Tuchkevich V.M., Frenkel V.Ya. FTI named after A.F. Ioffe during the war.// Questions of history, natural science and technology. 1975, No. 2.

125. Participation of the USSR in the Korean War // Questions of history. 1994, No. 11, No. 12.

126. Feklisov A.S. The feat of Klaus Fuchs // Military History Journal. 1991, no. 1.

127. Fomin F.T. Notes of an old Chekist. M., 1964.

128. Khlevnyuk O.V. Politburo. Mechanisms of political power in the 30s. M., 1996.

129. Holloway D. Stalin and the Bomb: The Soviet Union and Atomic Energy. 1939 -1956. Translation from English. Novosibirsk: Siberian Chronograph, 1997.

130. Khrushchev and Ukraine. Kyiv, 1995.

131. Chekists of Krasnoyarsk. Collection. Krasnoyarsk, 1987.

132. Chekists tell. Sat. Books 1-8. M., 1970-1991.

133. Cherednichenko M. The development of the theory of the strategy of offensive operations in 1945 1953.// Military History Journal. 1976, No. 8

134. Chernitsky A.M. Bodyguard: Techniques, means, eligibility criteria, equipment and training. M., 1998.

135. Chistyakov N.F. By law and conscience. M, 1979.

136. Shamba T.M. CPSU and law enforcement agencies. M., 1979.

137. Shevyakova VV Activities of the Communist Party to further strengthen and improve the Soviet state apparatus in the RSFSR (1953-1957). Diss. .cand. ist. Sciences. M., 1958.

138. Shirokov A.I. The history of the formation and activities of Dalstroy in 1931 1941. Magadan, 1997.

139. Yakovlev A.N. The Bitter Cup: Bolshevism and the Reformation in Russia. Upper-Volzh. book. ed. 1994.

140. Yakovlev A.S. Soviet aircraft. M.: Science. 1979.

Please note that the scientific texts presented above are posted for review and obtained through recognition of the original texts of dissertations (OCR). In this connection, they may contain errors related to the imperfection of recognition algorithms. There are no such errors in the PDF files of dissertations and abstracts that we deliver.