The terrorist attack on the World Trade Center in New York divided the history of the United States of America into before and after. Three thousand people who died as a result of the explosion of the Twin Towers is an irreparable loss for the American people. Question: "Who blew up the towers?" remains open to many to this day. Too many logical inconsistencies in the official version of the investigation.

Mission Possible?

According to the official version, the twin towers were destroyed due to the explosions of the planes that rammed the buildings. The fire that broke out during the attack weakened the metal structures, and the building collapsed. Then the same thing happened to another skyscraper.

Ordinary people are still perplexed: how could people from Arab countries, whose names were previously known to the special services, come to the United States, undergo training in piloting passenger Boeings, carry dummies of firearms on board aircraft, capture several aircraft and ram several buildings with enviable accuracy?

This whole operation looks incredible, but, nevertheless, it is theoretically feasible. Much more complex questions of the commission involved in the investigation are asked by experts who have obtained the results of analyzes obtained after examining the wreckage of the twin towers. At the site of the tragedy, traces of explosives and thermite were found - a substance that reaches a temperature of 1500 degrees when burned. But let's talk about everything in order. Consider the main conspiracy theories of explosions.

Analysis of the debris of buildings taken to the landfill

Less than a month after the attack, the US army invaded Afghanistan, destroying the hotbeds of terrorism, and at the same time writing off their debts, destabilizing the situation in the region and laundering multibillion-dollar investments in the military industry, in which, as it became known during the election campaign, The Washington "hawks" have not only state, but also personal interests.

The terrorist act untied the hands of the US intelligence services, which received the right to listen to other people's conversations and read other people's letters, not only on their own territory, but in any corner of the world. Even the leaders of the G7 countries have no right to their little secrets from Washington. This was clearly shown by the phone tapping scandal. Angela Merkel.

There are many supporters of the idea that America's intelligence agencies at least knew about the preparation of terrorist attacks, and most likely played a key role in the preparation. Only with the support of "Big Brother" could Islamic radicals involved in al-Qaeda ties be able to enter the United States, receive first-class flight training, be on board aircraft with objects that look like firearms, hijack aircraft and accurately direct them to predetermined goals.

Like a house of cards

Looking at the collapse of the twin towers, experts agree that it is very similar to a controlled explosion. Such explosions are used when it is required to demolish a large building in a densely populated area of ​​the city. Explosive engineers, having studied the design of the structure, calculate the power of each charge placed in the base of the supporting structures. As a result, the demolished object should fold like a house of cards, so that each wall rushes inward.

During such events, just in case, the inhabitants of nearby houses are evacuated. If there is a mistake in the calculations or some charges do not work, the building, instead of folding inward, may fall on its side, and then the destruction will be much more than planned. Looking at the video, it's hard not to be surprised at how neatly and how quickly the towers fold. It looks like real professional explosives experts worked on this.

Well, what about the planes? After all, they were seen by thousands of people, and they are captured on the set. Supporters of the controlled explosion theory are sure that the planes were needed for a beautiful picture and so that the inhabitants would not have questions: how could a bunch of terrorists bring tons of explosives into two carefully guarded buildings in the center of New York and set the charges in such a way that they collapsed fully?

As for the plane that hit the Pentagon building, it may not have been at all. The footage, taken immediately after the attack, shows the destruction, but there are no details of the Boeing. The plane could explode, but it could not dissolve. Large pieces of the fuselage and engines should be visible. In addition, the damage to the building is too minor for an incursion by a large passenger airliner. They are more reminiscent of the consequences of a cruise missile hit, and terrorists simply could not have such missiles.

Who shot down the fourth plane?

There was also a fourth hijacked airliner, which the terrorists planned to aim either at the White House, or at the Capitol. But he did not reach his goal. According to the official version, the passengers entered into a fight with the terrorists, and as a result of a fight that ensued on board the aircraft, the liner crashed to the ground. Some conspiracy theorists believe that the US military shot down the plane. This theory is supported by the fact that the debris was scattered on long distance from each other. But several passengers managed to call their loved ones before the crash, even records of these conversations have been preserved, confirming the official version.

small atomic bomb

There are so many different opinions about the tragedy of September 11 that among them there are even completely fantastic and incredible ones. For example, in all seriousness they say that a small atomic bomb was detonated under every building. Allegedly, the New York authorities set a condition for the developers who planned to build the Shopping Center - to provide for the possibility of dismantling the building. After all, it is clear that sooner or later it will become unusable, and demolishing such a huge structure for those times, as it seemed then, will be much more difficult than building it. And for the subsequent dismantling, allegedly the builders laid a nuclear charge under each building. But this theory is easily refuted by critics. On site nuclear explosion, even if small, should be observed elevated level radiation. But he was not observed.

She's also a victim

According to the official version of the American government, the most painful thing is the question of the third tower that collapsed during the terrorist attack. This skyscraper was called the Seventh Tower of the World Trade Center. This building was not hit by a plane, however, it collapsed overnight, like two twin towers.

According to the official theory, the cause of the collapse was a fire spread from neighboring towers. Allegedly, the communications through which water was supplied to the building to automatically extinguish the fire were destroyed, the fire engulfed the building, the structures could not stand it and collapsed.

Half of the Americans surveyed several years ago did not even know that three buildings were destroyed during the events of 2001 in New York. Many of those who know do not believe that the 47-story building could have collapsed instantly in a fire. In the United States, activists have repeatedly demanded a new investigation into the case and the publication of the results of the investigation, but the authorities did not hear them or simply did not want to hear them.

An event that changed people's lives

It would not be an exaggeration to say that this day has become the most unusual on the planet in the 21st century. Then the inhabitants of all countries of the world clung their eyes to the screens of their TVs, "stuck" on the Internet. And there, on the screens, something completely unimaginable was happening, reminiscent of frames from a fantastic action movie. Huge passenger liners crashed into the skyscrapers of New York, tall buildings folded like toy houses, drowning in clouds of dust, reminiscent of a volcanic eruption. And - people: endless crowds of screaming, running through the streets, or frozen in the distance with a mobile phone to their ear ...

Alas, it was not a film, but almost a live report from the scene of an event that would later rightly be called the largest act of terrorism in the history of mankind. Events bearing a completely official name: "The September 11, 2001 attack in New York."

September 11, 2001 attack - how it happened

It is difficult to describe what happened, if only because the narrator inevitably slides into emotions, into personal assessments, and even into his own memories. Moreover, until now, after many years, certain mysteries, unexplored moments, and inconsistency of interpretations remain in the picture of a grandiose terrorist attack. However, the essence of what happened is as follows.

A group of Islamic terrorists seized four passenger liner, filled with people and performing scheduled flights. Further investigation revealed that there were a total of 19 attackers, all belonging to the same organization, al-Qaeda. In each of the planes there was at least one person who had undergone special training and was able to operate a passenger ship.

The terrorists sent two planes to tall buildings - the South and North towers of the World Trade Center, which were the pride of Manhattan and towered in its southern part. The planes crashed into these skyscrapers in turn, with an interval of about 16 minutes. As a result of the disaster, the buildings caught fire, and subsequently completely collapsed, burying a huge number of people under them. Naturally, all the passengers on the planes also died.

The third plane crashed into the Pentagon, and the fourth crashed in Pennsylvania, crashing into a field. As the investigation showed, his goal, apparently, was the building of the US Congress, but the terrorists failed to carry out their plans: a fight broke out on board with the crew and passengers, which eventually led to the crash of the plane. Naturally, everyone on the third and fourth ship also died.

The Pentagon building after a collision with a plane

At the moment, it is stated that as a result of these sad events, 2977 people died, not counting the 19 attackers. Also, 23 people are still listed among the missing without a trace.

That's what it looks like short description this extraordinary event, but for a more accurate picture, it must be supplemented with some important facts.

September 11, 2001 terrorist attack - additional facts

All the hijacked flights followed their schedules to distant California, that is, they had a lot of fuel on board, because the hijackings took place shortly after the departures. The plane flew into the North Tower at about the 95th floor, and into the South Tower at about the 80th floor. It is impossible to say more precisely, since in both cases they were Boeings, very large aircraft, and the contact area was more than one floor.

A terrible fire and the destruction caused by the disaster led to the collapse of giant buildings. The South Tower fell first, after it, about half an hour later, the North Tower (the fire in the building raged for 102 minutes). The third building, also part of the World Trade Center complex, fell in the late afternoon. It was too close to the attacked towers and could not withstand the temperature and mechanical stress that fell on its walls. In addition, the accumulated gas from the destroyed communications exploded inside the building.

Some time passed between the hijacking of the aircraft and their crash, during which many passengers managed to mobile communications connect with your family and friends. Someone said goodbye to life, someone tried to contact the special services. Many records of these negotiations have been preserved: emotional, deep, filled with fear and grief, but also with love for loved ones.

In some cases, passengers and crew tried to resist the terrorists. One of the aircraft, as already mentioned, as a result of such heroic actions did not reach its target. In the Boeing that crashed into the North Tower, at least one passenger and crew commander died before the collision; this is proved by the corollary.

Crash site of the 4th aircraft in Pennsylvania

In the first hours after terrorist act life in the United States has changed beyond recognition. No aircraft received permission to enter the country and land on its airfields. Passenger flights within the state were canceled, all foreign flights went to land in Canada and Mexico. Hundreds of fighters were lifted into the air, which patrolled the sky around all major cities.

New York played a special role. Thousands of firefighters, paramedics and rescue workers worked in Manhattan. All city police officers were involved, colleagues from other regions urgently arrived to help them. The destroyed twin towers left behind giant rubble, burning in which lasted about 100 days, while many harmful chemicals were released into the air.

Subsequently, US intelligence agencies found out that of the 19 terrorists, the majority (15 people) had citizenship Saudi Arabia, the rest were subjects of the UAE, Egypt and Lebanon. They were not typical shahid fanatics: they all had a good education and a well-established philosophy of life.

Consequences of the attack

The massive terrorist attack of September 11th had consequences befitting its magnitude. They manifested themselves in various spheres of life, and all over the world. Here are just a few of them.

material

In addition to the completely destroyed three skyscrapers of the World Trade Center, several more nearby buildings were significantly damaged, or even destroyed, including one church. Lost archives, works of art, countless documents. The southern part of Manhattan has weakened its business importance for many years. A lot of damage was done to the Pentagon building.

Political

The US government and Congress created a special commission known as the "9/11 Commission". She worked for two years, and came to the conclusion that the main organizer and perpetrator of the attack was the Islamic fundamentalist organization Al-Qaeda, which spent about half a billion dollars on the plot. The origin of these funds remains a mystery to this day.

The organization was led by Saudi Osama bin Laden. The basis of her ideology was hatred of Israel and the United States. In the years that followed, America, along with its allies, launched an unprecedented struggle against the fundamentalists, primarily al-Qaeda. Its leader was destroyed in Afghanistan by an American special detachment in May 2011.

All the leading countries of the world have revised their views on terrorism, realizing its global danger. Almost everywhere, security measures have been tightened significantly, especially on aircraft.

We can talk about the economic consequences of the event, and about its military significance, about the impact on geopolitics. But perhaps the main thing to note is the change, so to speak, in the modern philosophy of life. After such terrible events, all people, without exception, became acutely aware of what, in fact, a fragile world we live in. In this world, even the most powerful country is vulnerable, and danger lies in wait for a person not only in warring states. The terrorist attack in New York showed that the boundaries between enemies and friends have become illusory, and the brutality of wars does not necessarily manifest itself only on the fronts of local conflicts.

Beautiful temporary memorials have been erected on the site of the former twin towers; permanent monuments are under construction. The American nation celebrates this mournful date as the Day of Service and Remembrance. And in New York there is a high monument by Zurab Tsereteli - "Tear of Sorrow". Inside the broken bronze slab is a huge steel blob. This is a symbol of grief not only for the people who died in the terrorist attack. And maybe not even that much. This tear symbolizes the common pain of humanity, which after September 11 became in many ways different, not so carefree and happy.

It's been 17 years since that day, with Nine-Eleven, when three skyscrapers collapsed in New York. No, I'm not wrong. Not two, but three, but for some reason they prefer not to remember the third. And when a third plane crashed into the Pentagon wing being repaired, and in a strange way almost self-destructed, and another one crashed in the desert. And this is not all the mysteries of the tragedy that happened.

So, on the morning of September 11, 2001, four Boeing planes (two in Boston, one in Washington and another in Newark) were hijacked by some unknown persons, after which the first two planes crashed into the New York skyscrapers WTC-1 and WTC-2, the third hit the wall of the Pentagon, and the fourth crashed near Shanksville, Pennsylvania. The two towers of the World Trade Center, attacked by planes, suddenly completely collapsed in a very strange way within an hour and a half, neatly folding inwards. Also, for some reason, the neighboring skyscraper WTC 7 completely and neatly collapsed, although no planes hit it.

Only a few days passed after the “acts of terrorism” when the first official version of everything that happened was ready and the perpetrators were named. Osama bin Laden, who led this action from Afghanistan, and, of course, his offspring al-Qaeda, were immediately blamed. Also, the names of all 19 hijackers were immediately named, who left their cars near the airports, in which they found the Koran and instructions in Arabic “How to fly an airplane”, and miraculously preserved passports of “terrorists” were found in the wreckage of the aircraft. It followed from this that it was urgent to start bombing Afghanistan and invading Iraq.

In the fall of 2002, a special commission was created under the loud name "National Commission on Terrorist Attacks on the United States." It was chaired by former New Jersey Governor Thomas Kean. The commission included former employees of the CIA, the FBI, the Department of Justice and other government agencies. Philip Zelikow, a member of the administration of President Bush Jr., who also worked under Bush Sr., led all the actions and the course of the investigation.

The official version mentioned above took its final form on July 22, 2004, when the above-mentioned commission consisting of 83 people completed the report on 585 pages. The Keene Commission report confirmed the above version, which even now remains the only and irrefutable one.

And now let's give some facts showing how the US intelligence services are able to "investigate" and get the necessary and obviously announced results.

Cell Phones

The official report claims that all information from the Boeing that crashed into the WTC skyscraper was transmitted to the ground via mobile phones. In particular, flight attendant Betty Ong (Betty Ong) talked for 23 minutes, and flight attendant Madeline Sweeney (Madeline Sweeney) - 25 minutes. Sweeney's last words were: "I see water! I see buildings! .

And now the fact that the authors of the official report "forgot" about. In 2001, cell phone calls from an aircraft flying at over 700 km/h were not possible.

The fact is that when the phone enters the broadcast area of ​​the base station, or "cell", the so-called "greeting" occurs, which in 2001 took at least eight seconds. The "greeting" system was not designed for movement at a speed of 700 km / h and is possible with top speed at 150 km/h. And only in 2004, Qualcomm, together with American Airlines, developed a system that, using satellite, provides calls to cell phones from an aircraft on which a special mobile base station is installed. On July 15, 2004, a test run of the system was made, after which it began to function.

Cheating with speed

The official report of the Keane Commission provides a diagram of the alleged movement of Flight 175, which crashed into the south tower of the World Trade Center, according to which the plane overcame the final straight section from the city of Trenton to New York in four minutes.

Boeing traffic to New York

And now the fact: The distance between Trenton and New York in a straight line is 85 kilometers. For good measure, you can even consider it equal to 80. According to official data, the plane covered this distance in 4 minutes. Let's find the average speed of the liner in this section: V = 80 km / 4 min = 20 km/min = 1200 km/h. We get the speed of sound.

Of course, the Boeing 767 was not supersonic. AT technical specifications The Boeing 767-200 is said to have a maximum cruising speed at 12 km altitude of 915 km/h. And this is only at an altitude of 12,000 meters, where the air density is five times lower than at sea level, and the liner flew into the building at an altitude of several hundred meters. The same technical specifications say that the maximum allowable speed of the Boeing 767-200 (the so-called Vne - Velocity Never Exceed), exceeding which the aircraft will simply begin to collapse, is 0.86 the speed of sound, that is, about 1000 km / h. Therefore, even if the plane still managed to develop the speed of sound, it would have crumbled long before Manhattan. That is, the official investigation invites everyone to believe that it is impossible purely physical. So, another lie of the official investigation.

"Twins" could not collapse on their own

According to the official report, the 100-story skyscraper WTC-1 completely collapsed 1 hour 42 minutes after the plane hit, and its twin WTC-2 - 56 minutes later. The reason, of course, is indicated as follows - the impact and the subsequent fire that occurred after the Boeings hit the buildings.

But here some more surprising facts appear.

It turns out that the Twins were designed in such a way that, in addition to the wind load, they could withstand the frontal impact of the Boeing 707, the largest passenger airliner in those years. In the early 1970s, Leslie Robertson, who built the buildings, calculated the effect of a Boeing 707 colliding with the WTC tower. He reported the results to the New York Times, arguing that the towers would withstand the impact of an airliner flying at a speed of 960 km / h, that is, having taken the impact of the liner, the skyscraper would remain standing without undergoing serious structural damage. In other words, the central frame and the remaining standing perimeter will withstand the additional load resulting from the absence of the demolished part of the supporting structures. It was with such a margin of safety that the "twins" were built.

Frank DeMartini, one of the leaders of the WTC project, confirms this idea: the building is designed to withstand the impact of a Boeing 707 with maximum takeoff weight. It was the largest aircraft of that time. I am sure that the building would have withstood even a few blows from planes, since its structure resembled a frequent mosquito net, and the plane is like a pencil that pierces this net and does not affect the structure of the rest of it.

The fire also could not destroy the skyscrapers. Here is evidence that the official report is lying again:

So, the WTC-1 building withstood the first blow. However, in the next hour and a half, something happened as a result of the fire, which provoked the collapse of the tower. By the way, this is the first and only case in world history when a skyscraper actually turns into a pile of ruins as a result of an hour and a half fire - this is according to the official version.

In the mid-1990s, two British firms - British Steel and Building Research Establishment - conducted a series of experiments in the city of Cardington to determine the effect of fires on steel-framed structures. On the experimental model of an eight-story building, the steel structures did not have fire protection. Despite the fact that the temperature of the steel beams reached 900 °C (!) with a critically permissible maximum of 600 °C, in none of the six experiments did failure occur, although certain deformations did occur.

In August 2005, John R. Hall Jr. of the National Fire Protection Association of the United States published an analytical paper, "Fires in Tall Buildings." In particular, it provides statistics according to which, in 2002 alone, 7,300 fires occurred in high-rise buildings, many of which were very intense and lasted for many hours, having managed to absorb more than one floor. Despite casualties and significant damage, none of these fires resulted in collapses.

If that's not enough, here are some more concrete examples the most severe fires in recent decades:

On February 23, 1991, a fire broke out in the 38-story One Meridian Plaza building in Philadelphia. The fire started on the 22nd floor, engulfed 8 floors and lasted 18 hours. As a result of this fire, a lot of glass was broken, granite cracked and load-bearing walls sank. Nevertheless, the building survived and not a single part of it collapsed.

On May 4, 1988, the 62-story First Interstate Bank building in Los Angeles caught fire. The fire lasted 3.5 hours, 4.5 floors burned out - from the 12th to the 16th. But the load-bearing structures survived completely, and secondary structures and several floors between floors received only minor damage. The building survived.

On August 5, 1970, the 50-story building 1 New York Plaza exploded and started a fire that lasted six hours. There were no collapses.

On October 17, 2004, a skyscraper in the Venezuelan city of Caracas caught fire. The fire broke out at the level of the 34th floor, covered 26 (!) floors and lasted 17 hours. The building survived.

And, finally, a fire in that same New York World Trade Center. On February 13, 1975, a fire broke out in the north tower on the 11th floor, as a result of which 65% of the floor burned out completely. In addition, the fire spread down to the 9th and up to the 16th floors, but did not affect the office space and was limited to shafts inside the central frame. The fire lasted three hours, and despite its much higher intensity than September 11, 2001, the structure of the building was not damaged. Absolutely unscathed was not only the central frame, inside which the fire mainly spread, but also all the interfloor ceilings.

WTC fire in 1975

And the 47-storey "WTC 7" collapsed by itself ... by accident.

The official report claims that the WTC-7 "collapsed" due to the weakening of the supporting structures, despite the fact that no aircraft hit it.

As it turned out, very few knew about the demolition of building No. 7 of the World Trade Center. Its destruction somehow passed unnoticed against the background of the rest of the events of that day. This 47-story skyscraper, also called Salomon Brothers, housed the offices of the FBI, the Department of Defense, the 1RS tax service (according to the Online Journal, with a huge amount of compromising evidence, including the infamous Enron), counterintelligence United States, the stock exchange (with evidence of stock fraud), and various financial institutions. Its collapse occurred at approximately 17:20 New York time, and several rather curious incidents are associated with it at once.

FEMA claims that this building collapsed for the same reasons as the "twins" - due to the weakening of the supporting structures. But why? The plane did not hit him. Fires did not rage in it - only in three places there were small local fires: on the seventh, twelfth and twenty-ninth floors. If we recall the scheme of the entire WTC, then building No. 7 is the most remote from the "epicenter", separated from the main complex by another street. Where is his injury from? The report is silent on this.

Such a small fire allegedly caused the complete destruction of the WTC-7 building

And the most “truthful” in the world, the BBC even reported the collapse of the WTC-7 in advance.

Indeed, the reportage of the British television channel BBC BBC (BBC) looks unique. In the TV news broadcast, which aired at 10:00 London time, that is, at 17:00 New York time, the presenter told viewers that the WTC-7 building in New York had collapsed. But there were still 20 minutes before it collapsed. Moreover, the correspondent of the channel Jane Standley (Jane Standley), in her live report from New York, talked about the collapse of the WTC-7, being at the same time against its background. A rare photograph just depicts this moment - the WTC-7 building is indicated by arrows. The caption at the bottom of the screen reads: "The 47-story Salomon Brothers building next to the World shopping mall collapsed as well.

BBC talks about the destruction of WTC 7

However, at some point, apparently, the TV people realized what had happened, and at 17:14 the picture of the broadcast from New York was suddenly distorted by interference, and after a few seconds it completely disappeared.

How else to explain this incredible "glitch" if not the presence of a pre-written script? Is it possible that the building was planned to be demolished a little earlier, but they simply did not have time to bring information to London about the delay in this mise-en-scene of the performance, and the British continued to follow the script. So they got the press release before all this happened? But from whom and how?

Of course, such an incident caused a lot of questions to the BBC channel. However, head of news Richard Porter explained this mysterious story: “We are not part of a conspiracy. No one told us what to talk about and what to do on 9/11. No one told us in advance that the building was about to fall. We haven't received a press release or a script for what's to come."

It turns out that if no one told them anything in advance, it means that they themselves, on their own initiative, told about the collapse of the building, which will happen in 20 minutes. But we read further: "We don't have the original recording of the 9/11 reports - not because of a conspiracy, but because of confusion." A news recording of one of the most important days in the history of the channel was suddenly lost.

Dead "terrorists" turned out to be alive

Official list of "hijackers"

The list was accompanied by the following comment: “The FBI has absolute confidence in the accuracy of the identification of the nineteen hijackers responsible for the 9/11 terrorist attacks. In addition, the 9/11 investigations were scrutinized by the National Commission on Terrorist Attacks on the United States, and jointly by the Senate and House of Representatives. None of these checks raised the slightest doubt about the identity of the nineteen hijackers."

On September 23, 2001, the British BBC news agency unexpectedly reported that Walid al-Shehri, a Saudi citizen and named hijacker of Flight AA11, is now alive, well and doing well in Casablanca, Morocco. The Saudi Arabian Embassy confirmed that he studied at flight school in Daytona Beach, Florida. He left the US in September 2000 and works for Royal Air Morocco. This is further confirmed by the Associated Press, according to which Walid al-Shehri appeared at the American embassy in Morocco: “The FBI released his photograph, which was circulated in newspapers and television news around the world. This same Mr. al-Shehri showed up in Morocco, thus proving that he was not a member of the suicide pilot team.” So, minus one.

Wail al-Shehri (AA11) is also alive and well. He is a pilot and his father is a Saudi Arabian diplomat in Bombay. The Los Angeles Times, in an article dated September 21, 2001, reports that Gaafar Allaghani, the head of the information center of the Saudi Arabian Embassy in the United States, confirmed that he personally spoke to both father and son. So minus two.

Abdulaziz al-Omari (AA11) lost his passport while studying in Denver, which he reported to the police at the time. He now works as an engineer at Saudi Telecom. The Telegraph on September 23, 2001 quoted him as saying: “I couldn't believe it when I saw myself on the FBI list. They showed my name, my photo and my date of birth, but I'm not a suicide bomber. I'm here. I'm alive. I have no idea how to fly a plane. I had nothing to do with any of this." So minus three.

Said al-Ghamdi (UA93), a Saudi Airlines pilot, was in Tunisia during the events of 9/11, where he was taking an Airbus 320 flight course with 22 other pilots. The Telegraph quotes him as saying: “The FBI has not provided any evidence of my involvement in the attacks. You have no idea what it's like to be labeled a dead terrorist when I'm alive and innocent." Total, minus four.

Ahmed al-Nami (UA93) works as an office manager for Saudi Airlines in Riyadh: “As you can see, I'm alive. I was shocked to see my name on the [terrorist] lists. I've never heard of Pennsylvania, where I happen to have hijacked a plane." Total minus five.

Salem al-Hamzi (AA77) works at a chemical plant in Yanbu, Saudi Arabia: "I have never been to the US and have not left Saudi Arabia for the past two years." Total, minus six.

Khalid al-Midhar (AA77) - programmer in Mecca, Saudi Arabia: "I like to think that this is some kind of mistake." According to the Chicago Tribune, he was watching TV when his friends started calling him and asking if he was alive. Total, minus seven.

According to the Embassy of Saudi Arabia in the United States, Mohand al-Shehri (UA175) and Satam al-Sukami (AA11) are also alive and well. In total, minus nine.

And only on September 23, 2001, the head of the FBI, Robert Mueller, stated: "There are doubts about the identities of some of the hijackers. There is no legal evidence confirming the identities of the hijackers."
But despite the obvious falsification with the names of "terrorists", the same 19 original names appear in the official report of the Keane Commission.

Fake Bin Laden

And since now there is no evidence of the involvement of the "hijackers" in the attacks, it means that Al-Qaeda seems to have nothing to do with it, and there is no need to bomb Afghanistan.

But within a few days of the fall of the skyscrapers, a video of Osama bin Laden's confession dated December 14, 2001 "suddenly" appears at the disposal of the United States. She was allegedly found in a house in Jalalabad. And it is this record that forms the basis of the final conclusion of the official commission - the 9/11 attacks were carried out by Osama bin Laden and, of course, Al-Qaeda.

But what immediately attracts attention is that this video is of very low quality. And the man himself, who, according to the FBI, is bin Laden, does not look like him at all, and this is clearly visible even despite the poor quality. It is more dense, it has a different shape of the nose, lips, eyebrows and cheekbones. The FBI file says that bin Laden is left-handed, but the video shows him writing something with his right hand. In addition, on his finger it is distinguishable gold ring, and Islam, as you know, forbids a man to wear gold jewelry, and there is not a word about this in the dossier on bin Laden.

Two Bin Ladens

The photo shows two bin Ladens: on the left is an impersonator from the Jalalabad video, on the right is the real one. Even with the naked eye, you can see that the frame from the video and the photo are two completely different people, and the only similarities between them are a beard and a turban. And again, the fantastic arrogance of the American intelligence services, which did not even bother with such a "trifle" as the use of someone even slightly like the real bin Laden, is striking.

In the end, realizing that bin Laden was also a bug, the head of the FBI investigative department, Rex Tomb, admitted: "The September 11 attacks do not appear in the Osama bin Laden dossier, since there is no evidence of his involvement in the events of September 11" .

On March 29, 2006, Vice President Richard Cheney also split: “We have never claimed that Osama bin Laden had anything to do with the events of 9/11. We've never had conclusive evidence."

However, in the official report of the Keene Commission, Osama bin Laden remained the main character, and the main material evidence is the already refuted video fake.

How evidence was destroyed

The steel left after the destruction of the frames of the WTC towers was hastily sent for processing, not even allowing investigators to access it. More than 185 thousand tons of steel were eliminated from the "epicenter". Firefighters reported to the US Congress that about 80% (!) of the steel fragments were removed, and the investigators could not even demand that the remains be kept for analysis. In particular, the Chinese corporation Shanghai Baosteel Group purchased fifty thousand tons of steel from the collapse of the World Trade Center in the form of scrap at a price of $120 per ton. Thousands of tons of steel were sent for processing to India.

Such actions caused a wave of indignation among independent researchers and the families of the victims, but the newly minted mayor of New York, Mike Bloomberg, who replaced Rudolph Giuliani from this post in late 2001, replied that there were other ways to investigate the tragedy. 11 September. He also remarked that "simply looking at a piece of metal won't tell you anything."

Despite the protests of everyone who wanted to look at these "pieces of metal", the export of scrap was in full swing. The official reason for such a rush was that it was "completely useless rubbish that only gets in the way." Apparently, this "garbage" was so "useless" that its removal was carried out under the strictest control, and the trucks that took out the steel fragments from the "epicenter" area were equipped with expensive tracking devices so that, God forbid, this completely useless garbage did not turn out to be anywhere but smelting furnaces. The steel was removed from the "crime scene" in such speed mode that even a specially created government commission BPAT (Building Performance Assessment Team - Commission for Evaluating the Structural Characteristics of a Building), having only had the opportunity to look at the remains, had no right to either study these very remains or familiarize themselves with the drawings of buildings. Which, in fact, calls into question the very meaning of the creation of this commission.

Fire Engineering Magazine Editor-in-Chief Bill Manning, on behalf of the firefighters, expressed dissatisfaction with the actions of government organizations to destroy evidence and completely exclude independent researchers from studying them: “We have reason to believe that “official investigations” ... are not nothing more than a blatant farce imposed on us by political forces whose main interests, to put it mildly, are very far from revealing the truth ... The destruction of evidence must stop immediately.”

Manning also emphasized that the destruction of this steel is illegal: "according to the national fire investigation standard, all evidence of any fires in buildings over 10 stories must be preserved, and there are no exceptions to this rule."

And on September 26, 2001, Mayor Rudolph Giuliani banned all video and photography in the "epicenter" area. One photographer, who chose not to be named, had digital camera pictures erased by police and threatened with arrest if he went there again, but he was able to recover the erased images using PhotoRescue software.

As a result, everything that could shed light on the “9/11 terrorist attack” was very quickly destroyed and not a single expert could get acquainted with the “material evidence”.

Consequences of the attacks

Less than two weeks after September 11, a very interesting piece of legislation (the so-called Patriot Act) was presented to Congress for approval, and in just a month it became law. And in early October 2001, the American invasion of Afghanistan began. This is an unprecedented pace of decision-making, preparation for their implementation and actual implementation. But the essence of these very measures causes a large number of questions.

Consideration of the so-called anti-terrorism bill, called the Patriot Act, began on September 24, 2001. This draft law turned out to be very remarkable both in terms of content and methods of its implementation.

First, it came to Congress for consideration by bypassing the channels prescribed by law, that is, without its preliminary discussion under the authority of the Office of Administration and Budget.

Secondly, then Attorney General John Ashcroft demanded that Congress pass it within one week and no change. Despite such strict and specific instructions, the controversial document still caused some discussion - to the obvious displeasure of the minister. Realizing that it would not be so easy to “push through” the bill, Ashcroft, at a joint meeting with the heads of the Senate and the House of Representatives, warned that new terrorist attacks were surely coming, and Congress would be to blame if the law was not passed immediately. It was clear blackmail, and the very statement seemed absurd, but the Congress was not ready to withstand such pressure from the minister.

Just in case, in order to finally “push” the passage of this act, two especially stubborn congressmen - Tom Daschle and Patrick Leahy, who actively opposed, received envelopes with anthrax spores in the mail ...

Republican Congressman Ron Paul told the Washington Times in an interview that not a single congressman was even allowed to read the act. However, on October 12, it was approved by both houses of Congress, and on October 26, 2001, President Bush put his signature on the document, thereby giving the Patriot Act the status of law.

What is the meaning of the Patriot Act? Firstly, this act gives the right to federal employees to search homes, workplaces, computers and private property of citizens either without notifying them at all, or with post factum notification when the search has already been carried out.

Secondly, the CIA received an unlimited opportunity, without a court order, to establish surveillance of its citizens, if this is done "for intelligence purposes." This includes wiretapping and tracking the user's Internet activity. Incidentally, up to this point, the CIA's mission had been to carry out intelligence activities exclusively with respect to foreign "elements."

Thirdly, the FBI and other law enforcement agencies have the right to request medical, financial and academic records and government archives for any person, only by presenting a warrant, which the court is required to issue if it is required for an investigation in order to protect against "international terrorism". At the same time, sufficient grounds for a search are not even required, and the organization to which the warrant is presented does not have the right to tell anyone that the FBI has requested this data. Including the one whose data was requested!

Fourthly, freedom of speech is de facto limited, because any careless phrase can now be regarded as a terrorist plot. According to this act, domestic terrorism includes "actions that are exchanged as attempts, through threats or violence, to influence the political course of the state." As you can see, the concept of "domestic terrorism" is defined so vaguely that almost any political or other activist group (Greenpeace, for example) can fall under this definition. And anyone who disagrees with the actions of the government is also not immune from this. In addition to these acts, there were several more directives of a similar nature.

P.S. And this is only a small part of the “evidence” found in the “most credible” official investigation into the 9/11 tragedy. But even this, in my opinion, is quite enough to understand by what methods the United States is moving towards its goals, having destroyed more than three thousand Americans. In continuation of the investigation, I will talk about the mysterious plane that crashed into the Pentagon and mysteriously disappeared, and about the other, no less mysterious planes of that terrible day - September 11, 2001.

On September 11, 2001, a series of terrorist attacks were carried out in the United States, which resulted in the death of 2977 people. According to the official version, the devastating attacks were carried out by members of the Al-Qaeda* group, but there are facts that can refute the generally accepted point of view.

Fast Version

This is the official version of what happened. Early on the morning of September 11, 2001, four passenger Boeings were hijacked mid-air by Arab terrorists. The hijackers were armed only with clerical knives and gas cartridges. Two aircraft attacked the twin towers of the World Trade Center, located in the southern part of Manhattan, the third plane was sent to the Pentagon building, the fourth did not reach the Capitol and crashed in the middle of a field in Pennsylvania.

This version was formed just a few days after the tragedy, and the American government has not changed it again. Such hasty conclusions suggest that Washington was preparing for this in advance.

We have already encountered a situation where the White House "knew for sure" that Saddam Hussein was developing weapons of mass destruction, Muammar Gaddafi was sponsoring international terrorism, and Bashar al-Assad was using chemical weapons.

None of these allegations have ever been substantiated. However, these suspicions have become a pretext for the US-sanctioned use of military forces in Iraq, Libya and Syria. It is expected that after the events of September 11, the Americans stepped up military operations in Afghanistan.

Immediately after the explosions, the head of Al Qaeda * Osama bin Laden declared his non-involvement in the attacks. Unusual behavior for a man who has always been happy to take responsibility for the terrorist attacks he was involved in. Later, bin Laden nevertheless admitted his involvement in the events of September 11, however, according to some, this was a person only similar to the leader of Al Qaeda *.

Strange destruction

Probably, not everyone knows that during the attack on New York, three buildings of the World Trade Center (WTC) collapsed. In addition to the well-known twin towers No. 1 and No. 2, there was also a skyscraper No. 7. The government commission set up to investigate the events of September 11 preferred to keep silent about this fact. House number 7 is a 47-story high-rise, noticeably inferior to its twin brothers in growth.

In particular, it housed the New York branch of the CIA headquarters. This building avoided being hit by an aircraft, but by 5 pm it collapsed in the same way as the twin towers.

According to authorities, the cause of the collapse of the building was burning fragments that fell on it from collapsing skyscrapers, as well as the ensuing fire. However, WTC buildings numbered 3, 4, 5 and 6 were much closer to the towers, and they all survived. Maybe the fall of the 7th house had another reason?

As for the twin towers, researchers are still concerned about a curious question: why did not only the upper floors of the building collapse, but also the lower ones? The official version is inexorable: when the building was destroyed, the top carried away the rest of it.

However, here too there is a problem. Parts of the tower structure did not fall in different directions, but formed right under the base, like a house of cards.

The designers of the World Trade Center unanimously declare that when building skyscrapers, the possible hit of an aircraft was taken into account, as is the case with all skyscrapers. If a catastrophic scenario does occur, then, they say, it cannot lead to devastating consequences of this magnitude.

The footage of the disaster clearly shows that the planes crash into buildings in completely different ways: the liner “entered” the northern tower right in the center, the southern one at an acute angle, cutting off the edge of the skyscraper. At the same time, the destruction of the towers was surprisingly uniform and symmetrical, as in a prepared explosion. And then a strange thing happens: the south tower, less affected by the explosion, collapses first, and only half an hour later the north tower falls, where the consequences of the disaster should have been more impressive.

Experts analyzed the video of the collapse of the towers and almost unanimously stated that this is how the industrial demolition of buildings takes place. And indeed, if you carefully look at the slow-motion footage of the disaster, you can see how explosive waves run through the entire height of the building at equal distances - as if a pre-laid charge had detonated.

Here are two more facts that will make you think. Shortly before the attack, the floors into which the planes subsequently flew were closed for repairs. And a few weeks before the tragedy, the owner of the twin towers, Larry Silverstein, insured them for $ 3 billion, and insurance against terrorist attacks was prescribed as a separate item.

Electoral fire

According to the official conclusions, hundreds of thousands of tons of steel structures melted in a monstrous fire, and hundreds of tons of concrete were erased into dust.

Is it possible that ignited aviation kerosene, the combustion temperature of which is less than 1000 ° C, caused hardened steel to “tremble”, which melts at no less than 2000 ° C. At the same time, there was a critical loss of strength of 50 massive load-bearing beams at once, which is possible only if the fuel is evenly spilled over all areas of the floor.

As a result of the explosions, charred and unrecognizable body particles remained from the passengers of both Boeings. Meanwhile, the passport of Mohammed Atta, one of the hijackers, which became one of the main pieces of evidence in favor of the guilt of al-Qaeda *, turned out to be completely unscathed. According to the commission, the document miraculously survived a powerful explosion, fell out of the plane and landed safely near the building.

The US government was in such a hurry to come to the right conclusion that it was not even going to pay attention to such incidents. Further more.

The Commission of Inquiry announced the identification of some of the passengers and crew members of the aircraft by the "remains of DNA." And this is after the fire actually completely destroyed the body of the liner, made of aircraft-grade aluminum resistant to high temperatures.

It is curious that despite the “remnants of DNA” preserved in a fantastic way, the black boxes were recognized as completely destroyed by fire. Looking at this, it only remains to believe that the fire acted selectively, completely not guided by the laws of the physical world.

No trace

The third hijacked Boeing, flying American Airlines Flight 77, crashed into the Pentagon, according to official figures. In order to inflict the most sensitive damage to the building and people, the terrorists sent the liner along the lowest possible trajectory. It is known that the height of the Boeing 757 is 13 meters, the Pentagon - 24 meters.

Based on this, the final kilometers of the flight of the liner had to pass at a height of only a few meters above the ground, which is an almost impossible task for pilots who have just completed express courses.

Moreover, such a maneuver was absolutely unjustified, since, according to many experts, it would not lead to such damage as when falling at an angle. In this case, it would be difficult even for an inexperienced pilot to miss, given the impressive area of ​​\u200b\u200bthe Pentagon - 117,363 sq.m. It turns out that the terrorists, who carefully planned the attack, chose a more complicated and less effective path.

However, the main incident is ahead. Independent researchers who studied photographs of the disaster were alerted by the fact that the Boeing did not leave traces of the wings when it hit the building. Their fragments were not found nearby either. Moreover, even inside the destroyed section of the building there were no hints of aircraft fragments. According to official conclusions, they were all destroyed by a powerful explosion and fire, which is very doubtful.

All of these facts suggest another reason for the destruction in the Pentagon - a planned explosion. But if we assume that the Boeing 757 did not crash into the Pentagon, where did the car itself disappear with the passengers and crew of this ill-fated flight?

As for the fourth "Boeing", which did not reach the Capitol and crashed in the fields of Pennsylvania, it is the least of all questions. However, there are still inconsistencies. Authorities claim the ground impact was the cause of the deaths, but no significant number of aircraft fragments have been found at the alleged crash site. Eyewitnesses say that the wreckage was scattered for many kilometers. According to the assumption of researchers who do not share the official point of view, the liner could have been hit in the air by a rocket fired from a fighter.

The official version says that the passengers, having contacted their relatives by mobile phones, learned that two planes had already crashed into buildings in Manhattan and decided to prevent the plans of the hijackers. It was as a result of the struggle ensued on board that the plane went off course and went into a steep dive. However, experts argue that the ability to use cellular communication in flight appeared only in 2005.

Avoid inconsistencies

Everything in this story is alarming, including the behavior of top American officials. For example, President George W. Bush for a long time ignored the invitation to speak before Congress, but when he agreed to a meeting, he set conditions that seemed incomprehensible at first glance. He insisted on limiting the conversation in time - no more than an hour and the obligatory invitation to the event of Vice President Dick Cheney. At the request of the head of the White House, only two people were to be present from the commission investigating the tragedy.

After a long debate, it was still possible to agree on the participation of 10 members of the commission and remove the time limit. During the meeting, everyone expected to hear from the president exhaustive, and most importantly, reliable information about what had happened, but everything turned out to be much more complicated. Bush did not allow the meeting to be videotaped, audiotaped, or even transcribed. In addition, Bush and Cheney refused to take an oath that could assure listeners of the veracity of what was said.

In April 2004, the performance finally took place. However, to this day it is not known what Bush and Cheney said to the congressmen. Many draw attention to the absurdity of this situation. It looks like this if one witness agreed to speak in court only in the presence of another witness. Why is this needed? Probably in order to avoid inconsistency in testifying.

Every year, the belief grows stronger in the world that the attacks were planned by the US intelligence agencies in order to justify the actions of the US military in the Middle East. But it is premature to draw final conclusions. So far, we can say with certainty only the following: if the US authorities did not stage the attacks themselves, then at least they did not interfere with their planning.

* Al-Qaeda is a terrorist group, banned in the territory of the Russian Federation

The official version of the September 11 attacks, which led to the death of almost 3 thousand people, the destruction of three skyscrapers in Manhattan, including the two famous twin towers, as well as part of the Pentagon, and gave a new direction to world history, is striking in its absurdity.

It turns out that in a country obsessed with security, where there are about 20 special services - about one for each of the 19 Middle Eastern terrorists involved in the attacks, they were able to do what they allegedly did. Namely, possessing only the basics of flight training, to ram the targets, almost synchronously captured before this by airliners, beyond the strength of even experienced pilots, acting under the leadership of the bearded terrorist Osama bin Laden, who was hiding in a cave in Afghanistan. All this, like all other points of the official version, which we will consider in more detail below, is completely contrary to common sense.

Official version

This is the official version. Since it is widely known, we will dwell on it only briefly. Terrorists from the al-Qaeda group banned in Russia and other countries of the world, many of whom were known to the CIA, mostly Saudi nationals, legally entered the United States. They easily hijacked four passenger airliners, two of which were sent to the towers of the World Trade Center (WTC), one to the Pentagon, and another crashed under strange circumstances in Pennsylvania. In the latter case, the passengers allegedly resisted by "democratically voting" to rebuff the hijackers. At the same time, the WTC-7 tower mysteriously collapsed in Manhattan, into which no one crashed, and which the BBC television company in live collapsed 20 minutes before it happened. When correspondent Jane Standley was broadcasting about this and the victims of the new terrorist attack, the WTC-7 still loomed behind her, and the caption at the bottom of the screen already read: "The 47-story Salomon Brothers building next to the World Trade Center also collapsed." Anyone can check out this amazing YouTube report...

The hitch came out: the BBC reported the collapse of WTC-7 20 minutes before it happened. Photo: FA Bobo/PIXSELL/PA Images/TASS

The mass of inconsistencies and lies associated with the 9/11 attacks leave Americans with very little choice. The dilemma here is simple. On the one hand, it is required, turning off your mind, to believe in the official version or to pretend that you believe it, if you are a "patriot" of your country and do not want its reputational damage, exposing its leadership, without whose sanction such large-scale terrorist attacks would simply be impossible. It is very difficult to live with this awareness, and it is beyond the strength of the conformist majority. The second position is available only to a minority who are not afraid to go crazy in the face of the truth and scorn accusations of "conspiracy theories." This position, which is held by many Americans and not only, requires the recognition that bin Laden and his people are nothing more than decorations, since terrorist attacks of this magnitude could only be organized by the American intelligence services themselves with the assistance of politicians and the media.

But we are not Americans. We are patriots of Russia, not the United States, and therefore our hands are untied. Since the official American version is completely unsatisfactory and does not explain anything, let's turn to the "conspiracy theorists". If we dismiss fantastic versions, like a mini-nuclear explosion under the twin towers, launched, probably at the suggestion of the American authorities, in order to compromise all the others, then the following picture emerges.

Performers

Terrorists from Al-Qaeda, many of whom were known to the CIA, legally entered the United States, went to the attacks, taking their passports with them. Only a few of them had management skills light aircraft. Under no circumstances could they replace the pilots of civil airliners, especially at high speed "get" into the twin towers hidden in urban areas - among other skyscrapers, fly at a height of several meters on the ground, without damaging anything along the route, and ram the Pentagon.

The American authorities immediately blamed the leader of al-Qaeda for the incident, although it was obvious that this was a surprise for Osama bin Laden, he did not immediately allow himself to be persuaded to take responsibility for this and his semi-virtual group. And it can be understood: it is impossible for a person in their right mind to believe in the official version. Therefore, bin Laden dragged on for a long time and took responsibility for the September 11 attacks only on October 29, 2004.

What really happened? In fact, most likely American intelligence agencies deliberately allowed terrorists into the country, who probably really plotted terrorist attacks using aircraft. They were needed as cover. The fact that the terrorists went on the planes leaving their passports in the cars most likely indicates that they were training to see how they would do better when they learned how to fly the planes. Or the planes that rammed the Pentagon and the twin towers ... there was none at all, and, therefore, all this passport history.

Aircraft

Indeed, was it a boy? Witnesses to the attacks in New York on the morning of 9/11 give conflicting accounts of what hit the Twin Towers. Some say they saw or heard noise from small planes, some believe they saw rockets, others - large airliners. The latter probably evaluate their experience retrospectively, having watched well-known footage many times on TV. Meanwhile, it has been proven big planes they just couldn't hit the WTC skyscrapers without colliding with a couple of other skyscrapers along the way. From the air and at the speed with which they were supposed to fly, even very experienced pilots could not accurately “hit” the targets. A legitimate question also arises, where did the wreckage of the planes go - the engine of one of them, which was later "found" in the wreckage of one of the collapsed buildings, turned out to be from a plane of a different type than the one that allegedly rammed it. As for the Pentagon, as independent researchers have found, the area of ​​damage in the wing of the building, where the Boeing allegedly landed, is noticeably smaller than its wingspan. The penetration area is not as deep as it should be. There was no tail unit left from the plane, no corpses and suitcases of passengers ... Evaporated?

Also striking are the famous shots of an aluminum airliner, which can hardly withstand a bird strike, enters like a knife through butter into the steel structure of the WTC buildings, so that the tip of its nose is even shown on the other side of the skyscraper! Also absolutely unthinkable were calls from airliners, which were allegedly made by their passengers from their own mobile phones. At the height with which they were made, it was technically impossible ...

What really happened? It is quite obvious that no airliners crashed into the twin towers in New York and into the Pentagon building near Washington. Most likely, it was about cruise missiles that could avoid obstacles, which were assisted by "beacons" installed on buildings. Everything else is a crude imitation.

The most interesting question here, to which there is no unequivocal answer yet, is where did the people who supposedly were on the planes go? In fact, there were not so many of them, since, as the “conspiracy theorists” established, at least two of the aircraft allegedly taking part in the terrorist attacks were already decommissioned at that time, and could not be operated on September 11th. But where did those who were not originally "dead souls" go? They were killed, they underwent plastic surgery and moved to the other end of the country or abroad? Who knows.

Building

With the Pentagon, everything is clear - everything was organized there by the military and special services themselves, no civilian firefighters were even allowed to go there. Whether there was one cruise missile there or whether it was "helped" with the help of charges installed in the wing of the building being repaired, is not so important. The consequences of the incident were quickly eliminated, no one took dirty linen out of the hut - the military people are serious, they know how to keep their mouths shut.

The main intrigue is with New York skyscrapers. They seem to have collapsed before our eyes, live. But this should not have been - they were built taking into account the fact that they could withstand exactly what supposedly happened to them. Instead, the "twins" collapsed, sinking inward at the speed of free fall, as if someone had "chopped" all the supporting structures at once.

The current President of the United States, Donald Trump, himself a construction magnate, "in hot pursuit" did not believe that the planes could bring down the twin towers. Photo: www.globallookpress.com

What really happened? The Association of American Engineers and even future US President Donald Trump, himself a construction magnate, have long argued that the buildings should not have perished, they should have survived the impact of the plane. Trump thought so "in hot pursuit" - now, of course, he pretends that this is a terrorist attack. But engineers with professional knowledge capable of revealing deceit only strengthened their opinion. In addition, in 2009, an international group of researchers published an article in the journal Open Chemical Physics on the results of a chemical analysis of the WTC debris, where fragments of thermite, a super-combustible substance that burns through steel, were found. Its melting point is about 1500 degrees, while the combustion temperature of aviation fuel is only about 1000 degrees ... Only in this case, as the official version says, the death of buildings as a result of "weakening of the steel frame during the fire, combined with damage caused by exposure to aircraft."

The "controlled demolition" that actually took place was caused by a series of explosions at the key, most vulnerable points of skyscrapers, as a result of which they "formed" in clouds of dust, which always happens in such cases. Firefighters and other nearby people heard these explosions. There are records of voices standing in a cordon near the WTC-7 building that this skyscraper will soon be blown up. True, this case was delayed a little, which is why the BBC reported this earlier than necessary. There is footage on YouTube of this building collapsing - a typical directional explosion.

There is also plenty of other evidence that this is a deliberate provocation organized by the American authorities themselves. Even if there were ten times less evidence, this would be enough for an unambiguous verdict of an unbiased court: guilty. Let us mention in passing only one of them - not a single "bump" was killed during the terrorist attacks in New York. The victims of the attacks are mainly maintenance workers, service employees, firefighters, who, by the way, began to be brought to the US financial capital a few days before the attacks from other parts of the country ... There is evidence that important meetings in the area of ​​​​future attacks were canceled in advance, some valuable employees unexpectedly offered not to go to work on September 11 ...

Media involvement

It is clear that such a grandiose hoax would not have been possible without the involvement and involvement of the leading American federal television channels in it. According to independent researchers, they received blanks depicting future terrorist attacks in New York in advance, which they processed each in their own style. And planes crashing into skyscrapers, according to a physicist from the University of Cambridge, John Wyndham, is the most common hologram. That is why they entered skyscrapers made of heavy-duty steel without collapsing like a knife through butter, and even in one case pierced the building with their nose. It seems that the media worked out technologies for creating artificial reality - the same thing that America is struggling with today, like a fly entangled in a web.

Photo: www.globallookpress.com

Why and who needed it?

The answer to the question why this was necessary lies on the surface. The September 11 attacks became the "new Pearl Harbor" for the US ruling circles, which they had long dreamed of. They buried international law and instead of the self-disbanded USSR created a new enemy for Washington in the person of "international terrorism", which was allowed to be fought all over the world. Already on October 7, 2001, the Americans invaded Afghanistan in order to "punish the terrorists", having achieved on the wave of international sympathy for the victims of the tragedy, in particular, Russia's consent to organize under this sauce its military bases on the territory of the former USSR - in Uzbekistan and Kyrgyzstan. And with a very long range. In March 2003, the US attacked Iraq, plunging the entire region into chaos, giving birth to ISIS, banned in Russia. Then there was Libya, an attempt to overwhelm Egypt, Syria ... The Pentagon received almost 6 trillion dollars for the "fight against terror" in various countries over the past 16 years after the tragedy, and the US military-industrial complex acquired a new meaning for existence. The Americans then wrote off Russia. After all, if they had waited a bit, then perhaps the "terrorists" would not have had to blow up the New York skyscrapers.

However, this prohibitively cynical action, for which none of the special services, by the way, was punished, although it seemed to be a terrible failure, also had serious domestic political goals. In October 2001, the so-called Patriot act was adopted with a bang - a carefully and pre-designed federal law that significantly expanded the rights of special services for electronic surveillance and surveillance of Americans. A prison appeared in Guantanamo, and America itself finally turned into a police state in which "Big Brother" breathes down the back of every citizen.

The most cynical thing, however, is that some gentlemen actually made a lot of money on the September 11 tragedy, and they obviously acted on the assumption that there would be terrorist attacks, and very soon.

What an amazing coincidence: in July 2004, New York businessman Larry Silverstein became the tenant - for 99 years - of all seven WTC buildings. The contract amounted to 3.2 billion dollars, of which he managed to pay only 14 million, and ultimately earned more than 8 billion dollars. How did he do it? The main insured moment in the policies was the case of a terrorist act. He did not keep himself waiting long.

Provocations, provocations...

If we have not convinced anyone who is really responsible for the September 11 attacks, we note in conclusion that provocation has historically been the main instrument of US policy. This is the famous Boston Tea Party, and the explosion of the battleship "Maine" in the harbor of Havana, and the same Pearl Harbor, and the incident in the Gulf of Tonkin ... This list can go on and on, as well as the list of large-scale hoaxes in which the Americans managed to convince millions, even billions of people. The most striking of these was the US space program before the advent of the "shuttles", primarily the staging of landing on the moon. Remembering the memory of the innocent victims of the September 11 attacks, people have no right to forget how and why it was done. And that something similar can happen again, since no one is punished for it.