The stability of a cargo ship during movement is greatly influenced by its loading. The control of the vessel is much easier when it is not fully loaded. A vessel with no load at all is easier to steer, but since the propeller of the vessel is close to the surface of the water, it has increased yaw.

When accepting the cargo, and consequently, the increase in draft, the ship becomes less sensitive to the interaction of wind and wave and more steadily keeps on course. The position of the hull relative to the surface of the water also depends on the load. (i.e. the ship is heeling or trimming)

The moment of inertia of the ship's mass depends on the distribution of cargo along the length of the vessel relative to the vertical axis. If most of the cargo is concentrated in the stern holds, the moment of inertia becomes large and the ship becomes less sensitive to the disturbing effects of external forces, i.e. more stable on the course, but at the same time more difficult to bring to the course.

Improvement in agility can be achieved by concentrating the heaviest loads in the middle of the hull, but at the same time deteriorating driving stability.

Placing cargo, especially heavy weights, at the top causes roll and roll of the vessel, which negatively affects stability. In particular, the presence of water under the hold slips has a negative effect on controllability. This water will move from side to side even with rudder deflection.

The trim of the vessel worsens the streamlining of the hull, reduces speed and leads to a shift in the point of application of the lateral hydrodynamic force on the hull to the bow or stern, depending on the difference in draft. The effect of this displacement is similar to the change in the diametral plane due to the change in the area of ​​the bow or aft deadwood.

The trim on the stern shifts the center of hydrodynamic pressure to the stern, increases the stability of the movement on the course and reduces the agility. On the contrary, the trim on the nose, improving the agility, worsens the stability on the course.

When trimming, the effectiveness of the rudders may deteriorate or improve. When trimming to the stern, the center of gravity shifts to the stern (Fig. 36, a), the steering torque arm and the moment itself decrease, agility worsens, and driving stability increases. When trimming on the nose, on the contrary, when the “steering forces” and are equal, the shoulder and moment increase, so the agility improves, but the stability on the course becomes worse (Fig. 36, b).

When the bow is trimmed, the ship's agility improves, the stability of movement on the oncoming wave increases, and vice versa, strong peals of the stern appear on the tail wave. In addition, when trimming on the bow of the vessel, there is a desire to go out into the wind in forward gear and stop bowing downwind in reverse gear.

When trimmed to the stern, the ship becomes less agile. On the forward course, the ship is stable on the course, but in the oncoming waves it easily evades the course.

With a strong trim to the stern, the vessel has a desire to bear with its bow to the wind. In reverse, the ship is difficult to steer, it constantly strives to bring the stern to the wind, especially when it is lateral.

With a slight trim to the stern, the efficiency of the propellers increases and most ships increase their speed. However, a further increase in trim leads to a decrease in speed. Trim on the nose due to increased water resistance to movement, as a rule, leads to a loss of forward speed.

In the practice of navigation, trim to the stern is sometimes specially created when towing, when sailing in ice, to reduce the possibility of damage to propellers and rudders, to increase stability when moving in the direction of waves and wind, and in other cases.

Sometimes the ship makes a voyage, having some list on any side. The roll can be caused by the following reasons: incorrect location of cargo, uneven consumption of fuel and water, design flaws, lateral wind pressure, crowding of passengers on one side, etc.

Fig.36 Effect of trim 37 Effect of roll

Roll has a different effect on the stability of a single-rotor and twin-rotor vessel. When heeling, a single-rotor ship does not go straight, but tends to deviate from the course in the direction opposite to the roll. This is due to the peculiarities of the distribution of the forces of water resistance to the movement of the vessel.

When a single-rotor vessel moves without a roll, two forces and equal to each other in magnitude and direction will resist on the cheekbones of both sides (Fig. 37, a). If we decompose these forces into components, then the forces and will be directed perpendicular to the sides of the cheekbones and they will be equal to each other. Therefore, the ship will go exactly on course.

When the ship rolls over the area "l" of the submerged surface of the chin of the heeled side more area"p" cheekbones of the raised side. Consequently, the cheekbone of the heeled side will experience more resistance of the oncoming water and less - the cheekbone of the raised side (Fig. 37, b)

In the second case, the water resistance forces and applied to one and the other cheekbones are parallel to each other, but different in magnitude (Fig. 37, b). When decomposing these forces according to the parallelogram rule into components (so that one of them is parallel and the other is perpendicular to the side), we will make sure that the component perpendicular to the side is greater than the corresponding component of the opposite side.

As a result of this, it can be concluded that the bow of a single-rotor vessel, when heeling, deviates towards the raised side (opposite to heel), i.e. in the direction of least water resistance. Therefore, in order to keep a single-rotor ship on course, you have to shift the rudder in the direction of the roll. If the rudder is in the “straight” position on a heeled single-rotor ship, the ship will circulate in the direction opposite to the roll. Consequently, when making revolutions, the circulation diameter increases in the direction of the roll, and decreases in the opposite direction.

For twin-screw vessels, course deviation is caused by the combined effect of the unequal frontal resistance of water to the movement of the hull from the sides of the vessel, as well as by the different magnitude of the impact of the turning forces of the left and right machines at the same number of revolutions.

For a vessel without a roll, the point of application of the forces of water resistance to movement is in the diametrical plane, therefore, the resistance from both sides has an equal effect on the vessel (see Fig. 37, a). In addition, for a ship that does not have a roll, the turning moments relative to the center of gravity of the ship, created by the thrust of the propellers and , are practically the same, since the arms of the stops are equal, and therefore .

If, for example, the ship has a constant list to port, then the recess of the starboard propeller will decrease and the recess of the propellers on the starboard side will increase. The center of water resistance to movement will shift towards the heeled side and take a position (see Fig. 37, b) on vertical plane relative to which the stops of propellers with unequal application arms will act. those. then< .

Despite the fact that the right screw will work less efficiently than the left one due to the smaller depth, however, with an increase in the shoulder, the total turning moment from the right machine will become much greater than from the left, i.e. then< .

Under the influence of a larger moment from the right car, the ship will tend to evade towards the left, i.e. tilted side. On the other hand, an increase in water resistance to the movement of the vessel from the side of the cheekbones will predetermine the desire to divert the vessel in the direction of increased, i.e. starboard.

These moments are comparable in magnitude. Practice shows that each type of vessel, depending on various factors, deviates in a certain direction when heeling. In addition, it was found that the values ​​of the evasive moments are very small and they can be easily compensated by shifting the rudder by 2-3° towards the side opposite the side of the evasion.

Displacement completeness coefficient. Its increase leads to a decrease in force and a decrease in damping moment, and consequently, to an improvement in course stability.

The shape of the stern. The shape of the stern is characterized by the area of ​​​​the aft gap (undercut) of the stern (i.e., the area supplementing the stern to a rectangle)

Fig.38. To determine the area of ​​the aft undercut:

a) feed with an outboard or semi-outboard rudder;

b) stern with a rudder located behind the rudder post

The area is limited by the aft perpendicular, the keel line (base line) and the contour of the stern (shaded in Fig. 38). As a criterion for trimming the stern, you can use the coefficient:

where is the average draft, m.

The parameter is the coefficient of completeness of the DP area.

A constructive increase in the undercut area of ​​the aft end by 2.5 times can reduce the circulation diameter by 2 times. However, this will dramatically worsen the stability on the course.

Rudder area. An increase increases the lateral force of the rudder, but at the same time, the damping effect of the rudder also increases. In practice, it turns out that an increase in the rudder area leads to an improvement in agility only at large shift angles.

Relative elongation of the steering wheel. An increase with its area unchanged leads to an increase in the lateral force of the steering wheel, which leads to some improvement in agility.

Rudder location. If the rudder is located in a screw jet, then the speed of water flowing onto the rudder increases due to the additional flow velocity caused by the screw, which provides a significant improvement in agility. This effect is especially pronounced on single-rotor vessels in the acceleration mode, and as the speed approaches the steady value, it decreases.

On twin-propeller ships, the rudder located in the DP has a relatively low efficiency. If on such vessels two rudder blades are installed behind each of the propellers, then the agility increases sharply.

The influence of the ship's speed on its handling appears ambiguous. Hydrodynamic forces and moments on the rudder and hull of the ship are proportional to the square of the speed of the oncoming flow, therefore, when the ship is moving at a steady speed, regardless of its absolute value, the ratios between the indicated forces and moments remain constant. Consequently, at different steady speeds, the trajectories (at the same rudder angles) retain their shape and dimensions. This circumstance has been repeatedly confirmed by natural tests. The longitudinal size of the circulation (advance) significantly depends on the initial speed of movement (when maneuvering from low speed, the run-out is 30% less than the run-out from full speed). Therefore, in order to make a turn in a limited water area in the absence of wind and current, it is advisable to slow down and turn at a reduced speed before starting the maneuver. The smaller the water area in which the vessel circulates, the lower should be the initial speed of its course. But if during the maneuver the rotational speed of the propeller is changed, then the speed of the flow on the rudder located behind the propeller will change. In this case, the moment created by the steering wheel. It will change immediately, and the hydrodynamic moment on the ship's hull will change slowly as the speed of the ship itself changes, so the previous ratio between these moments will be temporarily violated, which will lead to a change in the curvature of the trajectory. With an increase in the rotational speed of the screw, the curvature of the trajectory increases (the radius of curvature decreases), and vice versa. When the ship's speed matches the propeller's nose speed, the curvature of the trajectory will return to its original value.

All of the above is true for the case of calm weather. If the ship is exposed to wind of a certain strength, then in this case the controllability depends significantly on the speed of the vessel: the lower the speed, the greater the effect of wind on controllability.

When for some reason it is not possible to allow an increase in speed, but it is necessary to reduce the angular rate of turn, it is better to quickly reduce the speed of the propulsors. This is more efficient than shifting the steering body to the opposite side.

Stability, which manifests itself with the longitudinal inclinations of the vessel, i.e., with trim, is called longitudinal.

Rice. one

Despite the fact that the trim angles of the vessel rarely reach 10 degrees, and usually amount to 2 - 3 degrees, the longitudinal inclination leads to significant linear trims with a large length of the vessel. So, for a ship 150 m long, the angle of inclination 1 0 corresponds to a linear trim equal to 2.67 m. In this regard, in the practice of operating ships, issues related to trim are more important than issues of longitudinal stability, since transport ships with normal ratios longitudinal stability is always positive.

With the longitudinal inclination of the vessel at an angle Ψ around the transverse axis Ts.V. will move from point C to point C1 and the support force, the direction of which is normal to the current waterline, will act at an angle Ψ to the original direction. The lines of action of the original and new direction of the support forces intersect at a point. The point of intersection of the line of action of the support forces at an infinitely small inclination in the longitudinal plane is called the longitudinal metacenter M.

Radius of curvature of the displacement curve C.V. in the longitudinal plane is called the longitudinal metacentric radius R, which is determined by the distance from the longitudinal metacenter to the C.V.

The formula for calculating the longitudinal metacentric radius R is similar to the transverse metacentric radius: R \u003d I F / V, where I F is the moment of inertia of the waterline area relative to the transverse axis passing through its C.T. (point F); V - volumetric displacement of the ship.

The longitudinal moment of inertia of the waterline area IF is much greater than the transverse moment of inertia I X . Therefore, the longitudinal metacentric radius R is always much larger than the transverse r. It is tentatively considered that the longitudinal metacentric radius R is approximately equal to the length of the vessel.

The basic position of stability is that the restoring moment is the moment of the pair formed by the ship's weight force and the supporting force. As can be seen from the figure, as a result of applying the external moment acting in the DP, called the trim moment Mdiff, the ship received a tilt at a small trim angle Ψ. Simultaneously with the appearance of the trim angle, a restoring moment MΨ arises, acting in the direction opposite to the action of the trim moment.

The longitudinal inclination of the ship will continue until the algebraic sum of both moments becomes equal to zero. Since both moments act in opposite directions, the equilibrium condition can be written as an equality:

M d and f = M Ψ

The restoring moment in this case will be:

M Ψ \u003d D ‘ G K 1 (1)

• where GK1 is the shoulder of this moment, called the shoulder of longitudinal stability.

From a right triangle G M K1 we get:

G K 1 \u003d M G sin Ψ \u003d H sin Ψ (2)

The value MG = H included in the last expression determines the elevation of the longitudinal metacenter above the C.T. vessel and is called the longitudinal metacentric height. Substituting expression (2) into formula (1), we obtain:

M Ψ \u003d D ‘ H H sin Ψ (3)

Where the product D'H is the coefficient of longitudinal stability. Bearing in mind that the longitudinal metacentric height H = R - a, formula (3) can be written as:

M Ψ \u003d D ‘ (R - a) sin Ψ (4)

• where a is the elevation of the C.T. vessel over his C.V.

Formulas (3), (4) are metacentric formulas for longitudinal stability. Due to the smallness of the trim angle in these formulas, instead of sinΨ, you can substitute the angle Ψ (in radians) and then:

M Ψ \u003d D ‘ · H · Ψ and l and M Ψ \u003d D ‘ · (R - a) · Ψ.

Since the value of the longitudinal metacentric radius R is many times greater than the transverse r, the longitudinal metacentric height H of any ship is many times greater than the transverse h, therefore, if the ship has lateral stability, then longitudinal stability is assured.

Vessel trim and trim angle

In the practice of calculating the inclinations of the vessel in the longitudinal plane, associated with the determination of the trim, instead of the angular trim, it is customary to use a linear trim, the value of which is determined as the difference between the draft of the vessel bow and stern, i.e. d \u003d T H - T K.

Rice. 2

The trim is considered to be positive if the ship's draft is greater with the bow than with the stern; trim to the stern is considered negative. In most cases, ships sail with a trim to the stern. Let's assume that a ship floating on an even keel along the waterline of the overhead line, under the influence of a certain moment, received a trim and its new effective waterline took position B 1 L 1. From the formula for the restoring moment, we have:

Ψ \u003d M Ψ D ‘ H

Let's draw a dotted line AB, parallel to VL, through the point of intersection of the aft perpendicular with B 1 L 1. Trim d - is determined by the leg BE of the triangle ABE. From here:

t g Ψ = Ψ = d / L

Comparing the last two expressions, we get:

d L = M Ψ D ‘ H , from here M Ψ = d L D ‘ H

Trim change during longitudinal movement of the load

Consider methods for determining the ship's draft under the action of a trimming moment on it, resulting from the movement of cargo in the longitudinal-horizontal direction.

Rice. 3

Let us assume that a load of weight P is moved along the ship by a distance ιx. The movement of cargo, as already indicated, can be replaced by the application of a moment of a pair of forces to the ship. In our case, this moment will be trimming and equal to: M diff \u003d P · l X · cosΨ. The equilibrium equation for the longitudinal movement of the load (the equality of the trimming and restoring moments) has the form:

R l x cos Ψ = D ‘ H sin Ψ

• where:

t g ψ = P I X D ‘ H

Since small ship inclinations occur around an axis passing through the C.T. area of ​​the waterline (point F), you can get the following expressions for the change in draft fore and aft:

∆ T H \u003d (L 2 - X F) t g ψ \u003d P I X D ‘ H (L 2 - X F)

∆ T H \u003d (L 2 + X F) t g ψ \u003d - P I X D ‘ H (L 2 + X F)

Consequently, drafts fore and aft when moving cargo along the ship will be:

T n \u003d T + ∆ T n \u003d T + P I x D ‘ H (L 2 - X F)

T k \u003d T + ∆ T k \u003d T + P I x D ‘ H (L 2 - X F)

Considering that tg Ψ = d/L and that D’ H sin Ψ = MΨ, we can write:

T n \u003d T + P I x 100 M 1 s m (1 2 - X F L)

T to \u003d T - P I x 100 M 1 with m (1 2 + X F L)

• where T is the ship's draft when positioned on an even keel;
• M 1cm - the moment trimming the ship by 1 cm.

The value of the abscissa X F is found from the “curves of the elements of the theoretical drawing”, and it is necessary to strictly take into account the sign in front of X F: when the point F is located forward of the midship, the value of X F is considered positive, and when the point F is located aft of the midship - negative.

Shoulder l X is also considered positive if the cargo is carried towards the bow of the vessel; when transferring cargo to the stern, the shoulder l X is considered negative.

Scale of changes in the draft of the extremities due to the reception of 100 tons of cargo

The most widely used are scales and tables of changes in draft fore and aft from the reception of a single cargo, the mass of which, depending on the displacement, is chosen equal to 10, 25, 50, 100, 1000 tons. The following considerations underlie the construction of such scales and tables. The change in the draft of the ship's extremities when receiving cargo is composed of an increase in the average draft by the value ΔТ and a change in the draft of the ends ΔТ H and ΔТ K . The value of ΔТ does not depend on the location of the received cargo, and the values ​​of ΔТ H and ΔТ K at a given draft and a fixed mass of cargo Р will change in proportion to the abscissa C.T. accepted cargo Xr. Therefore, using such a dependence, it is enough to calculate the changes in the draft of the ship’s ends from the acceptance of cargo, first in the area of ​​the bow and then the stern perpendiculars and build a scale or table of changes in the draft of the ship’s ends from the acceptance of a cargo with a mass of, for example, 100 tons. Values ​​ΔТ, ΔТ H , ΔТ K calculated by formulas.

Based on the received increments of the draft of the ship's ends, we build a graph of changes in these drafts from the reception of the specified cargo.

To do this, on a straight line a - b, we outline the position of the midship - frame and set aside on the selected scale to the right (in the bow) and to the left (in the stern) half the length of the vessel. From the points obtained, we restore the perpendiculars to the line a - b. On the bow perpendicular, we lay off the segment b - c, depicting on the selected scale the calculated change in draft by the bow when receiving cargo in the bow. Similarly, on the stern perpendicular, we lay down the segment a - d, depicting the calculated change in draft by the bow when taking the load into the stern. By connecting the straight points in - d, we get a graph of the change in draft by the bow from the reception of a load of 100 tons.

Rice. 4

Δ T n \u003d + 24 s m \u003d 0, 24 m;

Δ T k \u003d + 4 s m \u003d 0, 04 m

In the same way, a graph is plotted for changing the draft of the vessel astern from receiving cargo. Here, the segment b - e on the accepted scale depicts the change in draft by the stern when receiving a load of 100 tons in the bow, and the segment a - e - when receiving a load in the stern.

We calibrate scales. Above the graph (or below it), we draw two straight lines for drawing scales for draft changes: the upper one is for the bow, and the lower one is for the stern. On each of them we mark the points corresponding to the divisions 0 (their position is determined by the points of intersection of the line a - b with the graphs c - d and e - e, i.e., the points g - p). Then, between the line a - b and graphs c - d and ed, we select such segments, the length of which on the accepted scale would be equal to 30 or 10 cm of the change in draft. Such segments when grading the “nose” scale will be segments s - and and cl. As a result, we get 30 and 10 on the division scale. We divide the distances between 0 and 10, 10 and 20 into 10 equal parts. The sizes of these divisions on both parts of the scale should be the same.

Using the graph f - e, in a similar way we build a scale for the draft astern. In practical calculations, several scales are built for changing the draft of the ends from receiving 100 tons of cargo. Most often, scales are built for three drafts (displacements): draft of an empty vessel, draft of a vessel with a full load and intermediate.

Scales, diagrams or tables of changes in the draft of the ship's ends from the reception of a single load (for example, 100 tons) can be very different kind. Several such examples are given below in Figures 5-7.

Rice. 5 Curves of changes in the draft of the extremities from the reception of 100 tons of cargo, combined with the corresponding points on the ship
Rice. 6 The scale of changes in the draft of the ship's extremities from the reception of 100 tons of cargo, combined with the corresponding points on the ship
Rice. 7

Suggested reading:

After obtaining the value of the average draft MMM, corrections for trim are calculated.

1st correction for trim(correction for displacement of the center of gravity of the current waterline - Longitudinal Center of Flotation (LCF).

1st Trim Correction (tons) = (Trim*LCF*TPC*100)/LBP

Trim - ship trim

LCF - displacement of the center of gravity of the current waterline from the midships

TPC - the number of tons per centimeter of precipitation

LBP - distance between perpendiculars.

The sign of the correction is determined by the rule: the first trim correction is positive if LCF and is the largest of the bow and sludge located on one side of the midsection, which can be illustrated by Table 3.3:

Table 3.3. LCF correction signs

Trim	LCF nose	LCF feed
Stern	-	+
Nose	+	-

Note - it is important to remember the principle: when loading (increasing draft), the LCF always shifts aft.

2nd correction for trim(Nemoto's correction, the sign is always positive). It compensates for the error resulting from the displacement of the LCF position when changing the trim (18).

2nd Trim Correction (tons) =(50*Trim*Trim*(Dm/Dz))/LBP

(Dm/Dz) is the difference in the moment that changes the trim of the ship by 1 cm at two draft values: one 50 cm above the average recorded draft value, the other 50 cm below the recorded draft value.

If the ship has hydrostatic tables in the IMPERIAL system, the formulas take the following form:

1st Trim Correction =(Trim*LCF*TPI*12)/LBP

2nd Trim Correction =(6*Trim*Trim*(Dm/Dz))/LBP

Seawater Density Correction

Ship hydrostatic tables are compiled for a certain fixed density of outboard water - on sea vessels, usually at 1.025, on river-sea ships, either at 1.025, or at 1.000, or at both density values ​​simultaneously. It happens that tables are compiled for some intermediate density value - for example, for 1.020. In this case, it becomes necessary to bring the data selected from the tables for calculation into line with the actual density of outboard water. This is done by introducing a correction for the difference between the tabular and actual water densities:

Amendment = Displacement tab *(Density meas - Density tab) / Density tab

It is possible to immediately obtain the displacement value, corrected for the actual seawater density, without correction:

Displacement fact \u003d Displacement table * Density meas / Density table

Displacement calculation

After calculating the values ​​of the average ship draft and trim, the following is performed:

The ship's hydrostatic data determines the ship's displacement corresponding to the average MMM draft. If necessary, linear interpolation is used;

The first and second corrections "for trim" to the displacement are calculated;

The displacement is calculated taking into account corrections for trim, and corrections for the density of outboard water.

The calculation of the displacement, taking into account the first and second corrections for the trim, is carried out according to the formula:

D2 = D1 + ?1 + ?2

D1 - displacement from hydrostatic tables, corresponding to the average draft, t;

1 - first correction for trim (can be positive or negative), t;

2 - second correction for trim (always positive), t;

D2 - displacement, taking into account the first and second corrections for trim, i.e.

The first correction for trim in the metric system is calculated by formula (20):

1 = TRIM × LCF × TPC × 100 / LBP (20)

TRIM - trim, m;

LCF - value of the abscissa of the center of gravity of the waterline area, m;

TPC - the number of tons, by which the displacement changes, with a change in the average draft by 1 cm, t;

1 - First Amendment, vol.

The first correction for trim in the imperial system is calculated by formula (21):

1 = TRIM × LCF × TPI × 12 / LBP (21)

TRIM - trim, ft;

LCF - value of the abscissa of the center of gravity of the waterline area, ft;

TPI - the number of tons by which the displacement changes when the average draft changes by 1 inch, LT / in;

1 - first amendment (may be positive or negative), LT.

The TRIM and LCF values ​​are taken without regard to the sign, modulo.

All calculations in the imperial system are performed in imperial units (inches (in), feet (ft), long tons (LT), etc.). The final results are converted to metric units (MT).

The sign of the correction?1 (positive or negative) is determined depending on the location of the LCF relative to the midships and the position of the trim (bow or stern) in accordance with Table 4.1

Table 4.1 - Signs of correction? 1 depending on the position of the LCF relative to the midships and the direction of the trim

where: T AP - draft at the perpendicular, aft;

T FP - draft at the perpendicular, at the bow;

LCF is the value of the abscissa of the center of gravity of the waterline area.

The second correction in the metric system is calculated by formula (22):

2 = 50 × TRIM 2 × ?MTS / LBP (22)

TRIM - trim, m;

MTS is the difference between MCT 50 cm above the average draft and MCT 50 cm below the average draft, tm/cm;

LBP - distance between the bow and stern perpendiculars of the vessel, m;

The second correction in the imperial system is calculated by formula (23):

2 = 6 × TRIM 2 × ?MTI / LBP (23)

TRIM - trim, ft;

LBP - distance between the ship's fore and aft perpendiculars, ft;

MTI is the difference between MTI 6 inches above mean draft and MTI 6 inches below mean draft, LTm/in;

LBP is the distance between the ship's fore and aft perpendiculars, ft.

All calculations in the imperial system are made in imperial units (inches (in), feet (ft), long tons (LT), etc.). The final results are converted to metric units.

The displacement, taking into account the correction for the density of the outboard water, is calculated by the formula (24):

D = D 2 × g1 / g2 (24)

D 2 - displacement of the vessel, taking into account the first and second corrections for trim, t;

g1 - outboard water density, t/m 3 ;

g2 - tabular density, (for which the displacement D 2 is indicated in hydrostatic tables), t / m3;

D - displacement, taking into account corrections for trim and density of outboard water, m.

13. Sheer the upper deck, which is a smooth rise of the deck from the midships to the bow and stern, also affects the appearance of the vessel. A distinction is made between ships with standard sheer determined by the Load Line Rules, ships with reduced or increased sheer and ships without sheer. Often, sheer is not performed smoothly, but in straight sections with breaks - two or three sections at half the length of the vessel. Due to this, the upper deck does not have a double curvature, which simplifies its manufacture.

Deck line sea ​​vessels usually has the form of a smooth curve with a rise from the middle part in the direction of the bow and stern and forms a deck sheer. The main purpose of the sheer is to reduce the flooding of the deck when the vessel is sailing in waves and to ensure unsinkability when its extremities are flooded. River and sea vessels great height freeboard sheer, as a rule, do not have. The rise of the deck in the stern is set, proceeding, first of all, from the condition of non-flooding and unsinkability.

14. Die- this is the slope of the deck from the DP to the sides. Usually, the decks have open decks (upper and superstructure decks). Water falling on the decks, due to the presence of a death, flows down to the sides and from there is discharged overboard. The arrow of death (the maximum elevation of the deck in the DP in relation to the side edge) is usually taken equal to V50 of the width of the vessel. In cross section, the death is a parabola, sometimes, to simplify the manufacturing technology of the body, it is formed in the form of a broken line. Platforms and decks below the upper deck do not have a camber. The plane of the midship frame divides the ship's hull into two parts - bow and stern. The ends of the hull are made in the form of stems (cast, forged or welded). Nasal

(from lat. differens, genitive case differentis - difference)

inclination of the vessel in the longitudinal plane. D. s. characterizes the landing of the vessel and is measured by the difference between its draft (recesses) stern and bow. If the difference is equal to zero, they say that the ship is “sitting on an even keel”, with a positive difference, the ship is sitting with a trim to the stern, with a negative difference, with a trim on the bow. D. s. affects the agility of the vessel, the operating conditions of the propeller, the patency in ice, etc. D. s. it can be static and running, occurring at high speeds. D. s. usually regulated by the intake or removal of water ballast.

• - inclination of the ship in the longitudinal plane. It is measured with the help of an instrument - a trim gauge as the difference between the draft of the io-sa and the stern in meters ...

  Dictionary of military terms

• - vessel - inclination of the vessel in the longitudinal plane. D. determines the landing of the vessel and is measured by the difference between the drafts of the stern and bow. If the difference is zero, the ship is said to be "sitting on an even keel"...

  Big encyclopedic polytechnic dictionary

• - the angle of longitudinal inclination of the vessel, causing a difference in drafts of the bow and stern ...

  Marine vocabulary

• - from lat. Differences - the difference in the price of the goods when they are ordered and when they are received in trading operations...

  Glossary of business terms

• - in trading operations, this is the difference in the price of the goods when ordering and when receiving ...

  Big Economic Dictionary

• Economic dictionary

• - in trading operations: the difference in the price of the goods when ordering and receiving ...

  Encyclopedic Dictionary of Economics and Law

• - see Differentiation...

  Big Law Dictionary

• - the difference between the deepening of the bow and stern; is of great importance for sailing ships, since the agility of the vessel largely depends on D. ...

  Encyclopedic Dictionary of Brockhaus and Euphron

• - the difference in the draft of the vessel bow and stern ...

  Big encyclopedic dictionary

• - ; pl. trims / nts, R ....

  Spelling Dictionary of the Russian Language

• - husband, marine the difference between the loading of the stern and the bow; unloading, unloading. The trim starts on the stern, the loading of the stern is deeper. Differential male, mat. an infinitesimal amount...

  Dahl's Explanatory Dictionary

• - trim I m. The difference in the draft of the bow and stern of the ship; pitch angle of the vessel. II m. The difference in the price of the goods when ordering and upon receipt ...

  Explanatory Dictionary of Efremova

• - diff...

  Russian spelling dictionary

• - DIFFERENT, DIFFERENT a, m. différent m. lat. differens 205. Each Captain tries to bring his ship into the best trim, in order to win the wind from the enemy. Kush. MS 2 310. // Sl. eighteen...

  Historical Dictionary of Gallicisms of the Russian Language

• - The difference in the depth of immersion in the water of the stern and bow of the ship ...

  Dictionary of foreign words of the Russian language

"Ship trim" in books

V. Building a ship

From the book RUSSIAN IMPERIAL FLEET. 1913 author

V. Construction of the vessel In parallel with the production of detailed working drawings, an order is made for steel, stems and other necessary components of the vessel. Krom? In addition, directly after the preparation of the theoretical drawing, they proceed to the breakdown? ship to the plaza?, i.e.

ship board

From the book Big Soviet Encyclopedia(BO) author TSB

Vessel's board Vessel's board (from the German Bord), a set of framing and plating elements that form the side walls of the ship's hull. There are left (backboard) and right (starboard) B., if you look from the stern to the bow of the vessel. The cargo capacity of the ship depends on the height of the B.; height

Sail (ship)

From the book Great Soviet Encyclopedia (PA) of the author TSB

ship pitching

From the book Great Soviet Encyclopedia (KA) of the author TSB

Hull

From the book Great Soviet Encyclopedia (KO) of the author TSB

Vessel trim

From the book Great Soviet Encyclopedia (CI) of the author TSB

ship drift

From the book Great Soviet Encyclopedia (DR) of the author TSB

Vessel course

From the book Great Soviet Encyclopedia (KU) of the author TSB

Vessel survivability

From the book Great Soviet Encyclopedia (GI) of the author TSB

ship plating

From the book Great Soviet Encyclopedia (OB) of the author TSB

Vessel circulation

From the book Great Soviet Encyclopedia (CI) of the author TSB

Refloating a ship by moving the ship's center of gravity

From the author's book

Removing the vessel from the shoal by moving the center of gravity of the vessel It is used if the vessel does not have a double keel.1. The whole team moves to one of the sides and drags all the heavy cargo there.2. At maximum height keel aft is better

VI. PREPARATION OF THE SHIP FOR THE voyage AND SHOOTING ITS ANCHOR 1. Vessel's seaworthiness

the author Lugovoi S P

VI. PREPARATION OF THE SHIP FOR THE voyage AND ANCHORING 1. Seaworthiness of the ship Regardless of whether the ship sets off on a voyage with or without cargo, in any case, the seaworthiness of the ship must be ensured both in the port of departure and throughout the entire future

VIII. GROUNDING (ON REEFS, ON STONES) AND MEASURES TO REMOVE THE SHIP 1. Reasons for landing and measures to prevent the ship from running aground

From the book Accidents of ships and their warning the author Lugovoi S P

VIII. GROUNDING (ON REEFS, ON ROCKS) AND MEASURES TO REMOVE THE VESSEL 1. Reasons for grounding and measures to prevent the vessel from running aground Grounding of vessels (on reefs or rocks) occurs most often during fog or at night, as well as when sailing in narrowness or in a place

Chapter IV. The crew of the ship. Vessel captain

From the book Labor protection in transport author Korniychuk Galina

Chapter IV. The crew of the ship. Vessel captain Article 52. Composition of the ship's crew1. The ship's crew includes the captain of the ship, other officers of the ship and the ship's crew.2. In addition to the captain of the ship, the commanding staff of the ship includes assistants to the captain of the ship, mechanics,